Message181218
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
docs@python, flox, lemburg, pitrou |
| Date |
2013-02-02.21:40:08 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1359841208.27.0.901880239337.issue15369@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
|
| Content |
I don't really think they deserve documenting.
pystones can arguably be a cheap and easy way of comparing performance of different systems *using the exact same Python interpreter*. It's the only point of running pystones.
As for pybench, it probably had a point when there wasn't anything better, but I don't think it has anymore. We have a much better benchmarks suite right now, and we also have a couple specialized benchmarks in the tools directory. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013-02-02 21:40:08 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, lemburg, flox, docs@python |
| 2013-02-02 21:40:08 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1359841208.27.0.901880239337.issue15369@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-02-02 21:40:08 | pitrou | link | issue15369 messages |
| 2013-02-02 21:40:08 | pitrou | create | |
|