Message308060
| Author |
yselivanov |
| Recipients |
asvetlov, lukasz.langa, methane, pitrou, yselivanov |
| Date |
2017-12-11.16:50:18 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1513011018.08.0.213398074469.issue32251@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
|
| Content |
>> Looks nice. Can it speed up aiohttp too?
> Yes.
> aiohttp uses own streams but public API and internal implementation are pretty close to asyncio streams.
> Moreover C accelerated HTTP parser should work with proposed BufferedProtocol seamlessly.
I did some benchmarks, and it looks like BufferedProtocol can make httptools up to 5% faster for relatively small requests < 10Kb. Don't expect big speedups there.
For asyncpg, benchmarks that fetch a lot of data (50-100Kb) get faster up to 15%. So we'll definitely use the BufferedProtocol in asyncpg.
For applications that need to handle megabytes of data per request (like Antoine's benchmark) the speedup will be up to 2x. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017-12-11 16:50:18 | yselivanov | set | recipients:
+ yselivanov, pitrou, asvetlov, methane, lukasz.langa |
| 2017-12-11 16:50:18 | yselivanov | set | messageid: <1513011018.08.0.213398074469.issue32251@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-12-11 16:50:18 | yselivanov | link | issue32251 messages |
| 2017-12-11 16:50:18 | yselivanov | create | |
|