Message315618
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
azanella, hroncok, ned.deily, pitrou |
| Date |
2018-04-22.15:12:01 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1524409921.86.0.682650639539.issue33329@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
|
| Content |
> Why not export and use the canonical way of sigemptyset/sigfillset/sigaddset/sigdelset/sigismember instead of pushing for more potential non-conformant code?
I agree this is the proper fix and that's what I plan to do in Python 3.8. For Python 3.7 and earlier, though, we cannot add new features anymore, which is why I'm leaning towards a variant of the patch I showed above (which also minimizes the risk for regressions by introducing and using a new API). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2018-04-22 15:12:01 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, ned.deily, hroncok, azanella |
| 2018-04-22 15:12:01 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1524409921.86.0.682650639539.issue33329@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-04-22 15:12:01 | pitrou | link | issue33329 messages |
| 2018-04-22 15:12:01 | pitrou | create | |
|