Abbe, E. C. 1974. Flowers and inflorescences of the “Amentiferae.” Bot. Rev.40(2): 159–261.
Agababian, V. Sh. 1961. Materials on the palynosystematic study of the family Saxifragaceae s.l. Izv. Armenian Acad. Sci., Biol. Sci.14(2): 45–61. (In Russian).
—. 1964. Evolution of pollen grains in the orders Cunoniales and Saxifragales in relation to some problems in their systematics and phylogeny. Izv. Armenian Acad. Sci., Biol. Sci.17: 59–72. (In Russian).
-. 1973. Pollen grains of primitive angiosperms. (In Russian). Erevan.
Agarwal, S. 1963. Morphological and embryological studies in the family Olacaceae. I.Olax L. Phytomorphology13: 185–196.
Airy Shaw, H. K. 1973. See Shaw, H. K. Airy.
Alston, R. E. andB. L. Turner. 1963. Biochemical systematics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Andrews, H. N. 1961. Studies in paleobotany. Wiley. New York and London.
—. 1963. Early seed plants. Science142: 925–931.
Avetisian, E. M. 1952. Pollen morphology of the Boraginaceae and its significance for the study of phylogeny of the family. Candidate’s thesis. Erevan. (In Russian).
—. 1967. Morphology of pollen grains of the families Campanulaceae and allied families (Sphenocleaceae, Lobeliaceae, Cyphiaceae) in relation to their systematics and phylogeny. Trudy Bot. Inst. Armenian Acad. Sci.16: 5–41. (In Russian).
-. 1973. Palynology of the order Campanulales s.l.In: Spores and pollen morphology of recent plants. (In Russian). Proc. 3rd Intern. Palynol. Conf., Acad. Sci.USSR, Leningrad, pp. 90–93.
—. 1980. Palynomorphology of the family Calyceraceae.In: S. Zhilin (ed.). Systematics and evolution of higher plants, pp. 54–63. Nauka, Leningrad. (In Russian).
Axelrod, D. I. 1952. A theory of angiosperm evolution. Evolution4: 29–60.
—. 1970. Mesozoic palaeogeography and early angiosperm history. Bot. Rev.36: 277–319.
Ayensu, E. S. 1968a. Comparative vegetative anatomy of the Stemonaceae (Roxburghiaceae). Bot. Gaz.129: 160–165.
—. 1968b. The anatomy ofBarbaceniopsis, a new genus recently described in the Velloziaceae. Amer. J. Bot.55: 399–405.
—. 1972. Dioscoreales.In: C. R. Metcalfe (ed.). Anatomy of the monocotyledons. VI. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
Baas, P. 1972. Anatomical contributions to plant taxonomy II. The affinities ofHua Pierre andAfrostyrax Perkins et Gilg. Blumea20: 161–192.
—. 1975. Vegetative anatomy and the affinities of Aquifoliaceae,Sphenostemon, Phelline, andOncotheca. Blumea22: 311–407.
Badre, F., Th. Cadet, G. Cusset andM. Hideux. 1975. Position systematique, étude morphologique et palynologique du genreBerenice. Adansonia15: 135–146.
Baehni, C. 1934. Revision du genreMollia Mart, et Zucc. Candollea5: 403–426.
Bailey, I. W. 1956. Nodal anatomy in retrospect. J. Arnold Arbor.37(3): 269–287.
— andR. A. Howard. 1941. The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae. II. Vessels. IV. Rays of the secondary xylem. J. Arnold Arbor.22: 171–187, 556–568.
— andC. G. Nast. 1943. The comparative morphology of the Winteraceae. I. Pollen and stamens. II. Carpels. J. Arnold Arbor.24: 340–346, 472–481.
——. 1945a. The comparative morphology of the Winteraceae. VII. Summary and conclusions. J. Arnold Arbor.26: 37–47.
——. 1945b. Morphology and relationships ofTrochodendron andTetracentron. I. Stem, root and leaf. J. Arnold Arbor.26: 143–154.
—— andA. C. Smith. 1943. The family Himantandraceae. J. Arnold Arbor.24: 190–206.
— andA. C. Smith. 1942. Degeneriaceae, a new family of flowering plants from Fiji. J. Arnold Arbor.23: 356–365.
— andB. G. L. Swamy. 1951. The conduplicate carpel of dicotyledons and its initial trends of specialization. Amer. J. Bot.38: 373–379.
Baillon, B. M. 1867–1895. Histoire de plantes. Paris.
Bancroft, H. 1933. A contribution to the geological history of the Dipterocarpaceae. Förh. Geol. Fören. Stockholm55: 59–100.
—. 1935. The taxonomic history and geographical distribution of the Monotoideae. Amer. J. Bot.22: 505–519.
Baranova, M. A. 1972. Systematic anatomy of the leaf epidermis in the Magnoliaceae and some related families. Taxon21: 447–469.
—. 1975. Stomatographic investigation of the family Flagellariaceae. Bot. Zhurn.60: 1690–1697. (In Russian).
—. 1980. Comparative-stomatographic investigation of the families Buxaceae and Simmondsiaceae.In: S. Zhilin, (ed.). Systematics and evolution of higher plants, pp. 68–75. Nauka, Leningrad. (In Russian).
Basak, R. andK. Subramanyan. 1966. Pollen grains of some species ofNepenthes. Phytomorphology16: 334–338.
Bate-Smith, E. C., I. K. Ferguson, K. Hutson, S. R. Jensen, B. J. Nielsen andT. Swain. 1975. Phytochemical interrelationships in the Cornaceae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol.3: 79–89.
Battaglia, E. andE. J. Boyes. 1955. Post-reductional meiosis: its mechanism and causes. Caryologia8: 87–134.
Bausch, J. 1938. A revision of the Eucryphiaceae. Kew Bull.8: 317–349.
Behnke, H.-D. 1971a. Phytoferritin in sieve-tube plastids. Naturwissenschaften58: 151–152.
—. 1971b. Zum Feinbau der Siebröhren-Plastiden vonAristolochia undAsarum (Aristolochiaceae). Planta97: 62–69.
—. 1971c. Sieve-tube plastids of Magnoliidae and Ranunculidae in relation to systematics. Taxon20(5-6): 723–730.
—. 1971d. Über den Feinbau verdicker (nacré) Wande und der Plastiden in den Siebrohren vonAnnona undMyristica. Protoplasma72: 69–78.
—. 1972. Sieve-element plastids in relation to angiosperm systematics—an attempt towards a classification by ultrastructural analysis. Bot. Rev.38: 155–197.
—. 1973. Sieve-tube plastids of Hamamelididae. Electron microscopic investigation with special reference to Urticales. Taxon22: 205–210.
—. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phytogeny: ultrastructure. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 647–663.
—. 1976a. Ultrastructure of sieve-element plastids in Caryophyllales (Centrospermae), evidence for the delimitation and classification of the order. Pl. Syst. Evol.126: 31–54.
—. 1976b. Sieve element plastids ofFouquieria, Frankenia andRhabdodendron. Taxon25: 265–268.
—. 1977a. Transmission electron microscopy and systematics of flowering plants. Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl.1: 155–178.
—. 1977b. Zur Skulptur der Pollen-Exine bei drei Centrospermen (Gisekia, Limeum, Hectorella), bei Gyrostemonaceen und Rhabdodendraceen. Pl. Syst. Evol.128: 227–235.
— andB. L. Turner. 1971. On specific sieve-tube plastids in Caryophyllales. Further investigations with special reference to the Bataceae. Taxon20(5-6): 731–737.
— andR. Dahlgren. 1976. The distribution of characters within an angiosperm system. 2. Sieve-element plastids. Bot. Not.129: 287–295.
Bensel, C. R. andB. F. Palser. 1975. Floral anatomy in the Saxifragaceae s.l. II. Saxifragoideae and Iteoideae. Amer. J. Bot.62: 661–675.
Benson, M. J. 1904.Telangium scottii, a new species ofTelangium (Calymmatotheca) showing structure. Ann. Bot.13: 161–177.
Bentham, G. and J. D. Hooker. 1862–1883. Genera Plantarum. I-III. London.
Benzing, D. H. 1967. Developmental patterns in stem primary xylem of woody Ranales. Amer. J. Bot.54: 805–820.
Berg, C. C. 1977. Urticales, their differentiation and systematic position. Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl.1: 349–374.
—. 1978. Cecropiaceae, a new family of the Urticales. Taxon27: 39–44.
Berg, R. Y. 1960. Ovary, ovule, and endosperm ofCalochortus amabilis. With notes on the taxonomic position ofCalochortus. Nytt. Mag. Bot.8: 189–206.
—. 1962. Contribution to the comparative embryology of the Liliaceae:Scoliopus, Trillium, Paris, andMedeola. Skr. Norske Vidensk.-Akad. Oslo, I. Mat.-Naturvidensk. Kl. Ny Ser.4: 1–64.
Berger, A. 1930. Crassulaceae.In: A. Engler und K. Prantl, Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien,18a: 352–483, 487.
Bessey, C. E. 1897. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the angiosperms. Bot. Gaz.24: 145–178.
—. 1915. The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.2: 109–164.
Bews, J. W. 1927. Studies in the ecological evolution of the angiosperms. New Phytol.26: 1–21; 65–84; 129–148; 209–248; 273–294.
Bhatnagar, A. K. andM. Garg. 1977. Affinities of Daphniphyllum—palynological approach. Phytomorphology27: 92–97.
Bierhorst, D. W. 1971. Morphology of vascular plants. Macmillan. New York.
Björnstad, I. N. 1970. Comparative embryology of Asparagoideae-Polygonateae, Liliaceae. Nytt Mag. Bot.17: 169–207.
Blunden, G., R. Hardman andF. J. Hind. 1971. The comparative morphology and anatomy ofDioscorea sylvatica Eckl. from Natal and the Transvaal. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.64: 431–446.
— andK. Jewers. 1973. The comparative leaf anatomy ofAgave, Beschornia, Doryanthes andFucraea species (Agavaceae: Agaveae). J. Linn. Soc. London, Bot.66: 157–179.
Boureau, E. 1958. Contribution à l’étude anatomique des espèces actuelles de Rhopalocarpaceae. Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. (Paris)30: 213–221.
Brenan, J. P. M. 1966. The classification of Commelinaceae. J. Linn. Soc., Bot.59: 349–370.
Brewbaker, J. L. 1967. The distribution and phylogenetic significance of binucleate and trinucleate pollen grains in the angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot.54: 1069–1083.
Briggs, B. G. andL. A. S. Johnson. 1979. Evolution in the Myrtaceae—evidence from inflorescence structure. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales102: 157–256.
Bronckers, F. andF. Stainer. 1972. Contribution à l’étude morphologique du pollen de la famille des Stylidiaceae. Grana12: 1–22.
Brown, S. C. 1976. Biochemistry ofSimmondsia chinensis. M.A. Thesis, Claremont Grad. School, Claremont, Calif.
Brown, W. H. 1938. The bearing of nectaries on the phylogeny of flowering plants. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc.79: 549–595.
Brunner, F. andD. Fairbrothers. 1978. A comparative serological investigation within the Cornales. Serol. Mus. Bull.53: 2–5.
——. 1979. Serological investigation of the Corylaceae. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club106(2): 97–103.
Buchenau, F. 1871. Kleinere Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Juncaceen. Abh. Naturwiss. Vereine Bremen II.
Bugnon, P. 1922. Sur la position systématique des Euphorbiacées. Compte. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci.175: 629–632.
Burkill, I. H. 1951. Dioscoreaceae.In: Flora Malesiana. Series I. Vol. 4, part 3, pp. 293–335.
—. 1960. The organography and evolution of Dioscoreaceae, the family of yams. J. Linn. Soc. London, Bot.56: 319–412.
Burtt, B. L. 1977. Classification above the genus, as exemplified by Gesneriaceae, with parallels from other groups. Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl.1: 97–109.
Buxbaum, F. 1954. Morphologie der Blüte und Frucht vonAlstroemeria und der Anschluss der Alstroemerioideen bei den echten Liliaceen. Oesterr. Bot. Z.101: 337–352.
—. 1959. Beiträge zur Morphologie der GattungTricyrtis. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen35: 55–75.
Calestani, V. 1905. Contributo alla sistematica delle Ombrellifere d’Europa. Webbia1: 89–280.
Camp, W. H. andM. M. Hubbard. 1963. On the origin of the ovule and cupule in Lyginopterid pteridosperms. Amer. J. Bot.50: 235–243.
Campbell, D. H. 1930. The relationships ofPaulownia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club57: 47–50.
Canright, J. E. 1952. The comparative morphology and relationships of the Magnoliaceae. I. Trends of specialization in the stamens. Amer. J. Bot.39: 484–497.
—. 1955. The comparative morphology and relationships of the Magnoliaceae. IV. Wood and nodal anatomy. J. Arnold Arbor.36: 119–140.
Capuron, R. 1962. Révision des Rhopalocarpacées. Adansonia Sér. 2,2: 228–267.
—. 1963. Contribution à l’étude de la flore à Madagascar. Adansonia, Sér. 2,3(3): 370–400.
—. 1965. Description des fruits deDiegodendron humbertii R. Capuron (Diegodendracées). Adansonia, Sér. 2,5(4): 503–505.
—. 1968. Sur le genrePhysena Noronh. ex Thouars. Adansonia, Sér. 2,8(3): 355–357.
—. 1969. Contribution à l’étude de la flore forestière de Madagascar. Sur la place du genreKaliphora Kook. f. Adansonia, Sér. 2,9(3): 395–397.
—. 1970. Observations sur les Sarcolaenacées. Adansonia, Sér. 2,10: 247–265.
Carlquist, S. 1964. Pollen morphology of Sarcolaenaceae (Chlaenaceae). Brittonia16: 231–254.
—. 1966. Anatomy of Rapateaceae—roots and stems. Phytomorphology16: 17–38.
—. 1969. Rapateaceae.In: C. R. Metcalfe (ed.). Anatomy of the monocotyledons. III. Commelinales-Zingiberales: 130–145. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
—. 1975. Ecological strategies of xylem evolution. U. of Calif. Press. Berkeley.
—. 1976a. Wood anatomy of Roridulaceae: ecological and phylogenetic implications. Amer. J. Bot.63: 1003–1008.
—. 1976b. Wood anatomy of Byblidaceae. Bot. Gaz.137: 35–38.
—. 1976c. Wood anatomy and relationships of the Geissolomataceae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club102: 128–134.
—. 1977a. Wood anatomy of Tremandraceae: phylogenetic and ecological implications. Amer. J. Bot.64: 704–713.
—. 1977b. Wood anatomy of Grubbiaceae. J. S. African Bot.43: 129–144.
—. 1978. Wood anatomy and relationships of Bataceae, Gyrostemonaceae, and Stylobasiaceae. Allertonia1: 297–330.
— andL. DeBuhr. 1977. Wood anatomy of Penaeaceae (Myrtales): comparative, phylogenetic and ecological implications. J. Linn. Soc., Bot.75: 211–227.
Carolin, R. C. 1959. Floral structure and anatomy in the family Goodeniaceae Dumort. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales84: 242–255.
—. 1960. The structures involved in the presentation of pollen to visiting insects in the order Campanales. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales85: 197–207.
—. 1966. Seeds and fruits of the Goodeniaceae. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales91: 58–83.
—. 1978. The systematic relationships ofBrunonia. Brunonia1: 9–29.
Carpenter, C. S. andW. C. Dickison. 1976. The morphology and relationships ofOncotheca balansae. Bot. Gaz.137: 141–153.
Casper, S. J. 1963. Systematisch massgebende Merkmale für die Einordnung der Lentibulariaceae in das System. Oesterr. Bot. Z.110: 108–131.
Cavaco, A. 1952. Recherches sur les Chlaenaceae, famille endémique de Madagascar. Mém. Inst. Sci.Madagascar, Sér. B,4: 59–92.
Cave, M. S. 1948. Sporogenesis and embryo sac development ofHesperocallis andLeucocrinum in relation to their systematic position. Amer. J. Bot.35: 343–349.
—. 1955. Sporogenesis and the female gametophyte ofPhormium tenax. Phytomorphology5: 247–253.
—. 1967. [1968]. The megagametophyte ofAndrocymbium. Phytomorphology17: 233–239.
—. 1970. Chromosomes of the California Liliaceae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.57: 1–48.
—,H. J. Arnott andS. A. Cook. 1961. Embryogeny in the California Peonies with reference to their taxonomic position. Amer. J. Bot.48: 397–404.
Chanda, S. 1966. On the pollen morphology of the Centrolepidaceae, Restionaceae, and Flagellariaceae, with special reference to taxonomy. Grana Palynol.6: 355–415.
— andK. Ghash. 1976. Pollen morphology and its evolutionary significance in Xanthorroeaceae.In: I. K. Ferguson and J. Muller (eds.). The evolutionary significance of the exine. pp. 527–559. Academic Press, London.
Chang, Tsin-tan. 1964. Pollen morphology of Hamamelidaceae and Altingiaceae. Acta Inst. Bot. Komarovii, Ser. 1,13: 172–227. (In Russian).
Chapman, J. L. 1966. Comparative palynology in Campanulaceae. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.69(3-4): 197–204.
Charlten, W. A. andA. Ahmed. 1973. Studies in the Alismataceae. IV. Developmental morphology ofRanalisma humile and comparisons with two members of the Butomaceae,Hydrocleis nymphoides andButomus umbellatus. Canad. J. Bot.51: 899–910.
Chaudhuri, S. K. andM. Mallik. 1965. Pollen morphological studies of the order Malvales. Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal19: 32–36.
Cheadle, V. I. 1942. The occurrence and types of vessels in the various organs of the plant in the Monocotyledoneae. Amer. J. Bot.29: 441–450.
—. 1955. The taxonomic use of specialization of vessels in the metaxylem of Gramineae, Cyperaceae, Juncaceae and Restionaceae. J. Arnold Arbor.36: 141–157.
—. 1963. Vessels in Iridaceae. Phytomorphology13: 245–248.
—. 1968 [1969]. Vessels in Haemodorales. Phytomorphology18: 412–420.
—. 1969. Vessels in Amaryllidaceae and Tecophilaeaceae. Phytomorphology19: 8–16.
—. 1970. Vessels in Pontederiaceae, Ruscaceae, Smilacaceae and Trilliaceae.In: N. K. B. Robson, D. F. Cutler and M. Gregory (eds.). New research in plant anatomy, pp. 45–50. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 63, Suppl. 1. Academic Press. London and New York.
— andH. Kosakai. 1971. Vessels in Liliaceae. Phytomorphology21: 320–333.
——. 1972. Vessels in Cyperaceae. Bot. Gaz.133: 214–223.
——. 1973. Vessels in Juncales. I. Juncaceae and Thurniaceae. Phytomorphology23: 80–87.
-and-. 1975. Vessels in Alstroemeriales.In: H. Y. Mohan Ram et al. (eds.). Form, structure and function in plants, pp. 292–299. Meerut.
-and J. M. Tucker. 1961. Vessels and phylogeny of Monocotyledoneae.In: Recent advances in botany. From lectures and symposia presented to the IX International Botanical Congress in Montreal 1959,1: 161–165. Toronto.
Chevalier, A. 1947. La famille des Huacaceae et ses affinités. Rev. Int. Bot. Appl. Agric. Trop.27 (No. 291-292): 26–29.
Chupov, V. S. 1978. The comparative immunoelectrophoretic investigations of pollen proteins of some Amentiferous taxa. Bot. Zh. (Leningrad),63(11): 1579–1584. (In Russian).
— andN. G. Cutjavina. 1978. Comparative immunoelectrophoretic study of proteins of seeds of the Liliaceae. Bot. Zh. (Leningrad)63(4): 473–493. (In Russian).
-and -. 1980a. Serological studies in the order Liliales. Bot. Zh. (Leningrad).66 (in press). (In Russian).
— andN. G. Cutjavina. 1980b. Phylogeny of some groups of Liliales based on the data of serological analysis.In: S. Zhilin (ed.). Systematics and evolution of higher plants. Nauka. Leningrad.
Copeland, H. F. 1935. The structure of the flower ofPholisma arenarium. Amer. J. Bot.22: 366–383.
—. 1941. Further studies in the Monotropoideae. Madrono6: 97–119.
—. 1947. Observations on the structure and classification of the Pyroleae. Madroño9: 65–102.
Corner, E. J. H. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons. Vols. I., II. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Coulter, J. M. 1914. The evolution of sex in plants. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
— andC. J. Chamberlain. 1903. Morphology of the angiosperms. Appleton, New York.
Crété, P. 1951. Répartition et intérêt phylogénétique des albumens à formations haustoriales chez les Angiospermes et plus particulièrement chez Gamopétales. Ann. Sci. Nat., Sér. 2,12: 131–191.
—. 1952. Contribution à l’étude embryologique des Datiscacées. Bull. Soc. Bot. France99: 152–156.
Croizat, L. 1940. On the phylogeny of the Euphorbiaceae and some of their presumed allies. Revista Univ. Chile25: 205–220.
-. 1960. Principia Botanica. 1a–1b. Codicote.
Cronquist, A. 1957. Outline of a new system of families and orders of dicotyledons. Bull. Jard. Bot. Etat27(1): 13–40.
—. 1965. The status of the general system of classification of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.52: 281–303.
—. 1968. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Nelson. London.
—. 1969. Broad features of the system of angiosperms. Taxon18: 188–193.
—. 1979. How to know the seed plants. Brown. Dubuque, Iowa.
Cuatrecasas, J. 1970. Brunelliaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph No. 2. Hafner. Darien, Conn.
Cutler, D. F. 1969. Juncales.In: C. R. Metcalfe (ed.). Anatomy of the monocotyledons. IV. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
— andH. K. Airy Shaw. (1965). Anarthriaceae and Ecdeiocoleaceae: Two new monocotyledonous families, separated from the Restionaceae. Kew Bull.19(3): 489–499.
Dahl, A. O. 1955. The pollen morphology of several genera excluded from the family Icacinaceae. J. Arnold Arbor.36: 159–163.
— andJ. R. Rowley. 1965. Pollen ofDegeneria vitiensis. J. Arnold Arbor.46: 308–323.
Dahlgren, R. 1975. A system of classification of the angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. Bot. Not.128: 119–197.
—. 1977a. A commentary on a diagrammatic presentation of the angiosperms in relation to the distribution of character states. Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl.1: 253–283.
—. 1977b. A note on the taxonomy of the “Sympetalae” and related groups. Publ. Cairo Univ. Herb.7-8: 83–102.
—. 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.80: 91–124.
—,S. R. Jensen andB. J. Nielsen. 1976. Iridoid compounds in Fouquieriaceae and notes on its possible affinities. Bot. Not.129: 207–212.
———. 1977. Seedling morphology and iridoid occurrence inMontinia caryophyllacea (Montiniaceae). Bot. Not.130: 329–332.
—,B. J. Nielsen, P. Goldblatt andJ. P. Rourke. 1979. Further notes on Retziaceae: its chemical contents and affinities. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.66: 545–556.
— andV. S. Rao. 1969. A study of the family Geissolomataceae. Bot. Not.122: 207–227.
——. 1971. The genusOftia Adans. and its systematic position. Bot. Not.124: 451–472.
Dang-Van-Liem. 1962. Recherches sur l’embryogenie des Tricoques. Thèse. Paris.
D’Arcy, W. G. andR. C. Keating. 1973. The affinities ofLithophytum: a transfer from Solanaceae to Verbenaceae. Brittonia25: 213–225.
Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. J. Murray. London.
—. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. J. Murray. London (Second edition, 1874).
—. 1876. The effects of cross and self fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. J. Murray. London.
Datta, J. M. andJ. N. Mitra. 1947. The systematic position of the family Moringaceae based on a study ofMoringa pterygosperma Gaertn. (M. oleifera Lam.). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.47: 355–357.
Daumann, E. 1965. Das Blüttennektarum bei den Pontederiaceen und die systematische Stellung dieser Familien. Preslia37: 407–412.
—. 1970. Das Blütennektarum der Monocotyledonen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner systematischen und phylogenetischen Bedeutung. Feddes Repert.80: 463–590.
Davidson, C. 1973. An anatomical and morphological study ofDatiscaceae. Aliso8: 49–110.
—. 1976. Anatomy of xylem and phloem of the Datiscaceae. Nat. Hist. Museum of Los Angeles County Contrib. Sci.280: 1–28.
Davis, G. L. 1966. Systematic embryology of the angiosperm. Wiley & Sons. New York, London, Sydney.
De Beer, G. R. 1954.Archaeopteryx lithographica. A study based upon the British Museum specimen. London: British Museum (Nat. Hist.).
DeBuhr, L. E. 1975. Phylogenetic relationships of the Sarraceniaceae. Taxon24(2-3): 297–306.
Decker, J. M. 1966. Wood anatomy and phylogeny of Luxembergieae (Ochnaceae). Phytomorphology16(1): 39–55.
—. 1967. Petiole vascularization of Luxembergieae (Ochnaceae). Amer. J. Bot.54: 1175–1181.
Dehay, C. 1935. L’appareil libéro-ligneux foliaire des Euphorbiaceae. Ann. Sci. Nat. (Paris), Ser. 10,17: 147–290.
—. 1942. L’appareil libéro-ligneux foliaire des Sterculiacées. Bull. Soc. Bot. France89: 76–78.
—. 1957. Anatomie comparée de la feuille des Chlaenacées. Mem. Inst. Sci. Madagascar, Sér. B,8: 145–203.
Delpino, F. 1871. Studi sopra un lignaggio anemofilo della Compositae. Firenze.
-. 1875. Ulteriori osservazioni sulla dicogamia nel regno vegetale. Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. 11, 12.
DeWilde, W. J. J. O. 1971. The systematic position of the tribe Paropsieae, in particular the genusAncistrothyrsis, and a key to the genera of Passifloraceae. Blumea19: 99–104.
Dhillon, M. 1976. Vascular anatomy of the flower ofKrameria parvifolia var.glandulosa Macbr. and its bearing on its taxonomic status. J. Res.13(2): 197–201.
Dickison, W. C. 1967. Comparative morphological studies in Dilleniaceae. I. Wood anatomy. J. Arnold Arbor.48: 1–29.
—. 1967. Comparative morphological studies in Dilleniaceae. II. Pollen. J. Arnold Arbor.48: 231–240.
—. 1971. Anatomical studies in the Connaraceae. I. Carpels. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.87: 77–80.
—. 1972a. Observations on the floral morphology of some species ofSaurauia, Actinidia, andClematoclethra. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.88: 43–54.
—. 1972b. Anatomical studies in the Connaraceae. II. Wood anatomy. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.88: 120–136.
—. 1973. Anatomical studies in the Connaraceae. III. Leaf anatomy. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.89: 121–138.
—. 1975. Studies on the floral anatomy of the Cunoniaceae. Amer. J. Bot.62: 433–447.
—. 1978. Comparative anatomy of Eucryphiaceae. Amer. J. Bot.65: 722–735.
— andP. Baas. 1977. The morphology and relationships ofParacryphia (Paracryphiaceae). Blumea23: 417–438.
— andE. M. Sweitzer. 1970. The morphology and relationships ofBarbeya oleoides. Amer. J. Bot.57: 468–476.
Diels, L. 1916. Käferblumen bei den Ranales and ihre Bedeutung für die Phylogenie der Angiospermen. Ber. Dt. Bot. Ges.34: 758–774.
-. 1930. Roridulaceae.In: A. Engler und K. Prantl. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien.18a: 346–348.
Ding Hou. 1972. Germination, seedling, and chromosome number ofScyphostegia borneensis Stapf (Scyphostegiaceae). Blumea20: 88–92.
Dollo, L. 1893. Les lois de l’évolution. Bull. Soc. Belg. Géol.7: 164–166.
Domin, K. 1922. Byblidaceae, a new archychlamydous family. Acta Bot. Bohemica1: 3–4.
Don, D. 1828. Descriptions ofColumellia, Tovaria, andFrancoa; with remarks on their affinities. Edinburgh New Philos.J. 1828–1829: 46–53.
Doyle, J. A. 1969. Cretaceous angiosperm pollen of the Atlantic Coastal Plain and its evolutionary significance. J. Arnold Arbor.50: 1–35.
-and L. J. Hickey. 1976. Pollen and leaves from the Mid-Cretaceous Potomac Group and their bearing on early angiosperm evolution.In: C. B. Beck (ed.). Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. New York. pp. 139–206.
Drugg, W. S. 1962. Pollen morphology of the Lennoaceae. Amer. J. Bot.49: 1027–1032.
Duigan, S. L. 1961. Studies of the pollen grains of plants native to Victoria, Australia. 1: Goodeniaceae (including Brunoniaceae). Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria N.S.74: 87–109.
Dunbar, A. 1975. On pollen of Campanulaceae and related families with special reference to the surface ultrastructure. Bot. Not.128(1): 73–101.
Eames, A. J. 1931. The vascular anatomy of the flower with refutation of the theory of carpel polymorphism. Amer. J. Bot.18: 147–188.
—. 1961. Morphology of the angiosperms. McGraw-Hill. New York, Toronto, London.
Eber, E. 1934. Karpellbau und Plazentationsverhältnisse in der Reiche der Helobiae. Flora127: 273–330.
Eckardt, T. 1937. Untersuchungen über Morphologie, Entwicklungsgeschichte und systematische Bedeutung des pseudomonomeren Gynoeceums. Nova Acta Leopold. Carol., N.F.5: 1–112.
—. 1938. Das pseudomonomeren Gynoeceum. Chron. Bot.4: 206–208.
—. 1967a. Blütenbau und Blütenwicklung vonDysphania myriocephala Benth. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.86: 20–37.
—. 1967b. Zur Blütenmorphologie vonDysphania plantaginella F. v. M. Phytomorphology17: 165–172.
—. 1967c. Vergleich vonDysphania mitChenopodium und mit Illecebraceae. Bauhinia3: 327–344.
Edwards, J. M., J. A. Churchill andU. Weiss. 1970. A chemical contribution to the taxonomic status ofLophiola americana. Phytochemistry9: 1563–1564.
Ehrendorfer, F. 1971. Samenpflanzen.In: Strasburger’s Lehrbuch der Botanik. 30 Auflage. Stuttgart, New York. (1978. 31 Auflage).
Eichler, A. W. 1875. Blüthendiagramme. I-II. Leipzig.
El-Hamidi, A. 1952. Vergleichend-morphologische Untersuchungen am Gynoecium der Unterfamilien Melanthioideae und Asphodeloideae der Liliaceae. Arl. Inst. Allgem. Bot. Univ. Zürich, ser. A,4: 1–49.
Endlicher, S. 1841. Enchiridion botanicum. Leipzig, Viennae.
Endlicher, S. L. 1836–1840. Genera plantarum. Wien.
Endress, P. K. 1967. Systematische Studie über die verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen den Hamamelidaceen und Betulaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.87: 431–525.
—. 1972. Zur vergleichenden Entwicklungsmorphologie, Embryologie und Systematik bei Laurales. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.92(2/3): 331–428.
—. 1977. Evolutionary trends in the Hamamelidales-Fagales group. Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl.1: 321–347.
Engler, A. 1893. Icacinaceae.In: A. Engler und K. Prantl (eds.). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 3,5: 233–257.
-. 1930. Saxifragaceae.In: A. Engler und K. Prantl (eds.). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Aufl. 2, 189.
Eramian, E. N. 1971. Palynological data on systematics and phylogeny of the Cornaceae Dumort. and related families.In: L. A. Kuprianova and M. S. Yakovlev (eds.). Morphology of the pollen of Cucurbitaceae, Thymelaeaceae, Cornaceae. Izd. “Nauka”. Leningradskoe Otdel. Leningrad. Pp. 235–273. (In Russian).
Erdtman, G. 1944. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. II. Notes on some monocotyledonous pollen types. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.38(2): 163–168.
—. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. Almqvist & Wiksell. Stockholm.
—,P. Leins, R. Melville andC. R. Metcalfe. 1969. On the relationships ofEmblingia. J. Linn. Soc., Bot.62: 169–186.
— andC. R. Metcalfe. 1963. Affinities of certain genera incertae sedis suggested by pollen morphology and vegetative anatomy. Kew Bull.17: 249–256.
Eyde, R. H. 1963. Morphological and palaeobotanical studies of the Nyssaceae. J. Arnold Arbor.44: 1–59, 328–376.
—. 1966. Systematic anatomy of the flower and fruit ofCorokia. Amer. J. Bot.53: 833–847.
—. 1967. The peculiar gynoecial vasculature of Cornaceae and its systematic significance. Phytomorphology17: 172–182.
—. 1968. Flowers, fruits and phylogeny of Alangiaceae. J. Arnold Arbor.49: 167–192.
—,D. H. Nicolson andP. Sherwin. 1967. A survey of floral anatomy in Araceae. Amer. J. Bot.54: 478–497.
Faegri, K. andL. van der Pijl. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. 3rd revised ed. Pergamon. Oxford.
Fagerlind, F. 1947. Die systematische Stellung der Familie Grubbiaceae. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.41: 315–320.
—. 1948. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Gynäceummorphologie und Phylogenie der Santalales-Familien. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.42: 195–229.
Fahn, A. 1954a. Anatomical structure of Xanthorrhoeaceae Dumort. J. Linn. Soc., Bot.55: 158–184.
—. 1954b. Metaxylem elements in some families of the Monocotyledoneae. New Phytol.53: 530–540.
—. 1974. Plant anatomy. 2nd ed. Pergamon. Oxford.
Fenzl, E. 1841. Die GattungTetradiclis Steven und ihre Stellung im naturlichen Systeme. Linnaea15: 289–299.
Ferguson, I. K. 1977. Cornaceae. World pollen and spore flora6: 1–34, Stockholm.
-and M. J. Hideux. 1980. Some aspects of the pollen morphology and its taxonomic significance in Cornaceae sens. lat.In: Proc. IV Internat. Palynol. Conf. Lucknow, India (in press).
Forman, L. L. 1966. The reinstatement ofGalearia Zoll, et Mor. andMicrodesmis Hook. f. in Pandaceae. Kew Bull.20: 309–321.
Foster, A. S. andE. M. Gifford. 1974. Comparative morphology of vascular plants. 2nd ed. Freeman. San Francisco.
Friedrich, H. C. 1956. Stüdien über die natürliche Verwandschaft der Plumbaginales und Centrospermae. Phyton (Austria)6: 220–263.
Frohne, D. andJ. John. 1978. The Primulales: serological contributions to the problem of their systematic position. Biochem. Syst. Ecol.6: 315–322.
Fryns-Claessens, E. andW. Van Cotthem. 1973. A new classification of the ontogenetic types of stomata. Bot. Rev.39: 71–138.
Fryxell, P. A. 1968. A redefinition of the tribe Gossypeae. Bot. Gaz.129: 296–308.
Fuchs, H. P. 1967. Pollen morphology of the family Bombacaceae. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.3: 119–132.
Fukuoka, N. 1972. Taxonomic study of the Caprifoliaceae. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyoto Univ. Ser. Biol.6: 15–58.
Fulvio, T. E. di andM. S. Cave. 1965. Embryology ofBlanfordia nobilis Smith (Liliaceae), with special reference to its taxonomic position. Phytomorphology14(4): 487–499.
Garay, L. A. 1960. On the origin of the Orchidaceae. Bot. Mus. Leafl.19: 57–96.
García, V. 1962. Embryological studies on the Loasaceae with special reference to the endosperm haustoria.In: Plant embryology. A symposium. Pp. 157–161. CSIR. New Delhi.
Gaussen, H. 1946. Les gymnospermes actuelles et fossiles. Toulouse.
Gerasimova-Navashina, E. N. 1958. On the gametophyte and on the salient features of development and functioning of reproducing elements in angiospermous plants. (In Russian).In: Probl. Bot. (Leningrad)3: 125–167.
Ghiselin, M. T. 1969. The triumph of the Darwinian method. University of California Press. Berkeley.
Gibbs, R. D. 1974. Chemotaxonomy of flowering plants. Vols.I-IV. McGill-Queen’s Univ. Press. Montreal and London.
Gisin, H. 1967. La systématique idéale. Z. Zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch.5: 111–128.
Gobi, C. 1916. A review of the system of plants. Petrograd. (In Russian with French summary).
—. 1921. Classification génétique des fruits des plantes angiospermes. Ann. Inst. d’essais de semences au Jard. Impér. Princ. bot. Pierre le Grand 4,4: 5–30. (In Russian with French summary).
Goebel, K. 1933. Organographie der Pflanzen. III. Fischer. Jena.
Gottsberger, G. 1970. Beiträge zur Biologie von Annonaceen-Blüten. Oesterr. Bot. Z.118: 237–239.
Gottwald, H. andN. Parameswaran. 1966. Das sekundäre Xylem der Familie Dipterocarpaceae, anatomische Untersuchungen zur Taxonomie und Phylogenie. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.85: 410–508.
——. 1967. Beiträge zur Anatomie und Systematik der Quiinaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.87(3): 361–381.
Gundersen, A. 1950. Families of dicotyledons. Chronica Botanica Co. Waltham, Mass.
Gzyrian, M. S. 1952. The family Salicaceae and its place in the system of angiosperms on the basis of the wood anatomy. Candidate’s Thesis. Erevan. (In Russian).
—. 1955. Intergeneric relationships in the Salicaceae. Dokl. Armenian Acad. Sci.105(4): 832–834. (In Russian).
Haines, R. W. andK. A. Lye. 1975. Seedlings of Nymphaeaceae. J. Linn. Soc., Bot.70: 255–266.
Hallier, H. 1901. Über die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der Tubifloren und Ebenalen, den polyphyletischen Ursprung der Sympetalen und Apetalen und die Anordnung der Angiospermen Überhaupt. Vorstudien zum Entwurf eines Stammbaums der Blütenpflanzen. Abh. Naturwiss. Naturwiss. Verein Hamburg16(2): 1–112.
-. 1902. Beiträge zur Morphogenie der Sporophylle und des Trophophylle in Beziehung zur Phylogenie der Kormophyten. Jahrb. Hamburg. Wiss. Anst. XIX, 3. Beiheft, 1–110.
—. 1903a. Vorläufiger Entwurf des naturlichen (phylogenetischen) Systems der Blütenpflanzen. Bull. Herb. Boissier II,3: 306–317.
—. 1903b. Über die Abgrenzung und Verwandschaft der einzelnen Sippen bei den Scrophularineen. Bull. Herb. Boissier II,3(2): 181–207.
—. 1904. Über die GattungDaphniphyllum, ein Übergangsglied von den Magnoliaceen und Hamamelidaceen zu den Katzchenblüthlern. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) XVIII,207: 55–69.
—. 1905. Provisional scheme of the natural (phylogenetic) system of flowering plants. New Phytol.4: 151–162.
—. 1908. ÜberJuliania, eine Terebinthaceen-Gattung mit Cupula, und die wahren Stammeltern der Katzchenblüthler. Neue Beitrage zur Stammesgeschichte nebst einer Übersicht über das natürliche System der Dicotyledonen. C. Heinrich. Dresden.
—. 1911. Über Phanerogamen von unsicherer oder unrichtiger Stellung. Meded. Rijks-Herb.1: 1–41.
—. 1912. L’origine et le système phylétique des Angiosperms exposés à l’aide de leur arbre généalogique. Arch. Néerl. Sci. Exact. Nat. Ser. 3,1: 146–234.
—. 1923. Über die Lennoeen. Beih. Bot. Centralbl.40: 1–19.
Hamann, U. 1961. Merkmalsbestand und Verwandtschaftbeziehungen der “Farinosae.” Willdenowia3: 169–207.
—. 1962a. Beitrag zur Embryologie der Centrolepidaceae mit Bemerkungen über den Bau der Blüten und Blütenstände und die systematische Stellung der Familie. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.75: 153–171.
—. 1962b. Weiteres über Merkmalsbestand und Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der “Farinosae.” Willdenowia3: 196–307.
—. 1963. Über die Entwicklung und den Bau des Spaltöffnungsapparats der Centrolepidaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.82: 316–320.
-. 1964. Embryologie und Systematik am Beispiel der Farinosae. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges.77, Generalversammlungsheft:(45)-(54).
—. 1966. Embryologische, morphologisch-anatomische und systematische Untersuchungen an Philydraceen. Willdenowia Beiheft4: 1–178.
—. 1975. Neue Untersuchungen zur Embryologie und Systematik der Centrolepidaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.96: 154–191.
—. 1976. Hydatellaceae—a new family of Monocotyledoneae. New Zealand J. Bot.14: 193–196.
Hartley, Th. G. 1969. A revision of the genusFlindersia (Rutaceae). J. Arnold Arbor.50: 481–526.
Hartog, C. den. 1970.Ondinea, a new genus of Nymphaeaceae. Blumea18: 413–416.
—,T. van Tholen andP. Baas. 1978. Epidermal characters of the Celastraceae sensu lato. Acta Bot. Neerl.27: 355–388.
Harvey-Gibson, R. I. 1909. A classification of fruits on a physiological basis. Trans. Liverpool Bot. Soc.1: 1–15.
Hawkes, J. G. andW. G. Tucker. 1968. Serological assessment of relationships in a flowering plant family (Solanaceae). Pp. 77–88in: Chemotaxonomy and serotaxonomy, Syst. Ass. Special Vol.2, J. G. Hawkes, ed. Academic Press. London, New York.
Hayden, W. J. 1977. Comparative anatomy and systematics ofPicrodendron, genus incertae sedis. J. Arnold Arbor.58: 257–279.
Heel, W. A. van. 1966. Morphology of the androecium in Malvales. Blumea13: 177–394.
—. 1967. Anatomical and ontogenetic investigations on the morphology of the flowers and the fruit ofScyphostegia borneensis Stapf (Scyphostegiaceae). Blumea15: 107–125.
Hegnauer, R. 1965. Chemismus und systematische Stellung der Cornaceae. Pp. 235–246in: Beiträge zur Biochemie und Physiologie von Naturstoffen. Festschrift Kurt Mothes zum 65 Geburtstag. G. Fischer. Jena.
—. 1966. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. Vol. 4. Birkhäuser. Basel.
—. 1969. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. Vol. 5. Birkhäuser. Basel.
Heinig, K. H. 1951. Studies in the floral morphology of the Thymelaeaceae. Amer. J. Bot.38: 113–132.
Henderson, M. W. 1919. A comparative study of the structure and saprophytism of the Pyrolaceae and Monotropaceae, with reference to their derivation from the Ericaceae. Contr. Bot. Lab. Morris Arbor. Univ. Pennsylvania5: 42–109.
Henslow, G. 1888. The origin of floral structures through insect and other agencies. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner. London.
Heydacker, F. 1963. Les types polliniques dans la famille des Cistaceae. Pollen & Spores7: 303–312.
Hickey, L. J. 1971. Evolutionary significance of leaf architectural features in the woody dicots. Amer. J. Bot.58: 469 (Abstr.).
— andJ. A. Doyle. 1972. Fossil evidence on evolution of angiosperm leaf venation. Amer. J. Bot.59: 661 (Abstr.).
Hideux, M. 1973. Apport du microscope électronique à balayage à la palynologie structurale Saxifragacées ligneuses australes. Thèse. Paris.
Hideux, M. J. andI. K. Ferguson. 1976. The stereostructure of the exine and its evolutionary significance in Saxifragaceae sensu lato.In: I. K. Ferguson and J. Muller (eds.). The evolutionary significance of the exine, pp. 327–377. Academic Press. London.
Hiepko, P. 1965a. Das zentrifugale Androeceum der Paeoniaceae. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.77(1964): 427–435.
—. 1965b. Vergleichend-morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über das Perianth bei den Polycarpicae. I. und II. Teil. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.84: 359–508.
—. 1966. Zur Morphologie, Anatomie und Funktion des Diskus der Paeoniaceae. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.79(5): 233–245.
Hillebrand, G. R. andD. E. Fairbrothers. 1970. Serological investigation of the systematic position of the Caprifoliaceae. I. Correspondence with selected Rubiaceae and Cornaceae. Amer. J. Bot.57: 810–815.
Hofmann, U. 1973. Morphologische Untersuchungen zur Umgrenzung und Gliederung der Aizoaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.93(2): 247–324.
—. 1977. Die Stellung vonStegnosperma innerhalb der Centrospermen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.90: 39–52.
Holm, L. 1969. An uredinological approach to some problems in angiosperm taxonomy. Nytt Mag. Bot.16(2): 147–150.
-. 1979. Some problems in angiosperm taxonomy in the light of the rust data.In: I. Hedberg, (ed.). Parasites as plant taxonomists. Symb. Bot. Ups.XXII (4).
Hooker, J. 1887.Lophopyxis. Hooker’s Icon.Pl. 18: t. 1714.
Houlbert, C. 1893. Recherches sur la structure comparée du bois secondaires dans les Apétales. Ann. Sci. Nat. (Paris), 7 sér., Bot.17: 1–183.
Huard, J. 1965. Remarques sur la position systèmatique des Rhopalocarpacées d’après leur anatomie et leur morphologie pollinique. Bull. Soc. Bot. France112: 252–254.
Huber, H. 1963. Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der Rosifloren. Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München5: 1–48.
—. 1969. Die Samenmerkmale und Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der Liliifloren. Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München8: 219–538.
Hunziker, A. T. andE. L. Ariza. 1973. Aporte a la rehabilitatión de Ledocarpaceae, familia monotípica. Kurtziana7: 233–240.
Hunziker, H., H.-D. Behnke, I. J. Eifert andT. J. Mabry. 1974.Halophytum ameghinoi: a betalain-containing and P-type sieve-tube plastid species. Taxon23(4): 537–539.
Hutchinson, J. 1926, 1934. The families of flowering plants.I-II. Macmillan. London.
—. 1959. The families of flowering plants. I-II. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
—. 1967. The genera of flowering plants (Angiospermae) vol. II. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
—. 1969. Evolution and phylogeny of flowering plants. Academic Press. London and New York.
—. 1973. The families of flowering plants arranged according to a new system based on their probable phylogeny. 3rd ed. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
Ilyana, G. M. 1976. Embryology of Papaveraceae in relation to phylogeny.In: Materials of the 5th Moscow conference on plant phylogeny, pp. 66–69. Moscow. (In Russian).
Jäger-Zürn, I. 1965. Zur Fragen der systematische Stellung der Hydrostachyaceae auf Grund ihrer Embryologie, Blüten und Infloreszenzmorphologie. Oesterr. Bot. Z.112: 621–639.
—. 1966. Infloreszenz- und blütenmorphologische sowie embryologische Untersuchungen anMyrothamnus Welw. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen42: 241–271.
Janssonius, H. H. 1950. Wood anatomy and relationship. Blumea6: 407–461.
Jeffrey, E. C. 1899. The development, structure and affinities of the genusEquisetum, Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist.5(5): 157–190.
—. 1917. The anatomy of plants. U. of Chicago Press. Chicago.
Jeffrey, C. 1977. Corolla forms in Compositae—some evolutionary and taxonomic speculations.In: V. H. Heywood and J. B. Harborne (eds.). The biology and chemistry of the Compositae,1: 111–118. Academic Press. London, New York, San Francisco.
Jensen, S. R., B. J. Nielsen andR. Dahlgren. 1975. Iridoid compounds, their occurrence and systematic importance in the angiosperms. Bot. Not.128: 148–173.
Jensen, U. 1965. Serologische Untersuchungen zur Frage der systematischen Einordnung der Didiereaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.84(3): 233–253.
—. 1968. Serologische Beiträge zur Systematik der Ranunculaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.88: 269–310.
—. 1974. The interpretation of comparative serological results.In: G. Bendz and J. Santesson (eds.). Chemistry in botanical classification, pp. 217–227. Nobel Symposium 25. Academic Press. New York and London.
Johnson, L. A. S. andB. Briggs. 1975. On the Proteaceae—the evolution and classification of a southern family. J. Linn. Soc., Bot.70: 83–182.
Johnston, I. M. 1936. A study of the Nolanaceae. Contr. Gray Herb.112: 1–83.
Johri, B. M. 1963. Embryology and taxonomy.In: P. Maheshwari (ed.). Recent advances in the embryology of angiosperms. pp. 395–444. U. of Delhi, Delhi.
—. 1970. Alismataceae and Butomaceae.In: Symposium on comparative embryology of angiosperms. Bull. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad.41: 334–335.
— andB. Tiagi. 1952. Floral morphology and seed formation inCuscuta reflexa Roxb. Phytomorphology2: 162–180.
Jonker, F. P. 1938. A monograph of the Burmanniaceae. Meded. Bot. Mus. Herb. Rijks. Utrecht51: 1–279.
Jörgensen, C. A. 1925. Frage der systematischen Stellung der Callitrichaceae. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.64: 440–442.
Joshi, A. C. andJ. V. Pantulu. 1941. A morphological and cytological study ofPolianthes tuberosa Linn. J. Indian Bot. Soc.20: 37–71.
Kamelina, O. P. 1976. On the comparative embryological study of members of the families Dipsacaceae and Morinaceae.In: Materials of the Vth Moscow conference on the plant phylogeny, pp. 71–73. Moscow. (In Russian).
-. 1977. Comparative embryological study of representatives of the families Dipsacaceae and Morinaceae. (In Russian). Candidate Thesis, Leningrad.
Kapil, R. N. 1970. Podostemaceae. Bull. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad.41: 104–109.
— andM. R. Vijayaraghavan. 1965. Embryology ofPentaphragma horsfieldii (Miq.) Airy Shaw with a discussion on the systematic position. Phytomorphology15: 93–102.
— andK. Walia. 1965. The embryology ofPhilydrum lanuginosum Banks ex Gaertn. and the systematic position of the Philydraceae. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen41: 381–404.
Kaul, R. B. 1967. Ontogeny and anatomy of the flower ofLimnocharis flava (Butomaceae). Amer. J. Bot.54: 1223–1230.
—. 1968a. Floral morphology and phytogeny in the Hydrocharitaceae. Phytomorphology18: 13–35.
—. 1968b. Floral development and vasculature inHydrocleis nymphoides (Butomaceae). Amer. J. Bot.55: 236–242.
—. 1969. Morphology and development of the flowers ofBootia cordata, Ottelia alismoides, and their synthetic hybrid (Hydrocharitaceae). Amer. J. Bot.56: 951–959.
—. 1970. Evolution and adaptation of inflorescences in the Hydrocharitaceae. Amer. J. Bot.57: 708–715.
—. 1976. Conduplicate and specialized carpels in the Alismatales. Amer. J. Bot.63: 175–182.
Keating, R. C. 1968. Comparative morphology of Cochlospermaceae. I. Synopsis of the family and wood anatomy. Phytomorphology18: 379–392.
—. 1970. Comparative morphology of Cochlospermaceae. II. Anatomy of the young vegetative shoot. Amer. J. Bot.57: 889–898.
—. 1972. Comparative morphology of Cochlospermaceae. III. The flower and pollen. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.59: 282–296.
—. 1973. Pollen morphology and relationships of the Flacourtiaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.60: 273–305.
Kimura, Y. 1956. Système et phylogenie des Monocotylédones. Notul. Syst. (Paris)15: 137–159.
Kolbe, K.-P. 1978. Serologischer Beitrag zur Systematik der Capparales. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.99: 468–489.
Kooiman, K. 1971. Ein phytochemischer Beitrag zur Lösung des Verwandtschaftsprobleme der Theligonaceae. Oesterr. Bot. Z.119: 395–398.
—. 1974. Iridoid glycosides in the Loasaceae and the taxonomic position of the family. Acta Bot. Neerl.23: 677–679.
Kosakai, H., M. F. Mosely andV. I. Cheadle. 1970. Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae. V. DoesNelumbo have vessels? Amer. J. Bot.57: 487–494.
Koster mans, A. J. G. H. 1978.Pakaraimaea dipterocarpacea belongs to Tiliaceae. Taxon27: 357–359.
Kozo-Poljanski, B. M. 1922. An introduction to phylogenetic systematics of the higher plants. Voronezh. (In Russian).
Krach, J. E. 1977. Seed characters in and affinities among the Saxifragineae. Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl.1: 141–153.
Kubitzki, K. 1969. Monographie der Hernandiaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.89: 78–209.
—. 1972. Probleme der Grossgliederung der Blütenpflanzen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.85: 259–277.
—. 1977. Classification and evolution of higher plants. Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl.1: 21–31.
—,A. A. L. Mesonita andO. R. Gottlieb. 1978. Chemosystematic implications of xanthones inBonnetia andArchytaea. Biochem. Syst. Ecol.6: 185–187.
Kuijt, J. 1968. Mutual affinities of Santalalean families. Brittonia20: 136–147.
—. 1969. The biology of parasitic flowering plants. U. of California Press. Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Kuprianova, L. A. 1948. Pollen morphology of the monocotyledons. Trudy Komarov Bot. Inst., USSR Acad. Sci., ser. 1,7: 163–262. (In Russian.).
-. 1965. The palynology of the Amentiferae. Nauka. Moscow-Leningrad. (In Russian.)
—. 1967. Palynological data for the history of the Chloranthaceae. Pollen et Spores9: 95–100.
Lawrence, G. H. M. 1951. Taxonomy of vascular plants. Macmillan Co., New York.
Leandri, J. 1937. Sur l’aire et la position systématique du genre malgacheDidymeles Thouars. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., sér. 10,19: 309–317.
Lebeque, A. 1952. Recherches embryogéniques sur quelques dicotylédones dialypetales. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., sér. 11,13: 1–160.
Lee, A. T. 1966. Xanthorrhoeaceae. Contr. New South Wales Nat. Herb. (Fl. Ser.)34: 1–42.
Leins, P. andW. Winhard. 1973. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studien an Loasaceen-Blüten. Oesterr. Bot. Z.122: 145–165.
Li, H.-L. andJ. J. Willaman. 1968. Distribution of alkaloids in angiosperm phylogeny. Econ. Bot.22: 239–252.
Linden, B. L. van der. 1960. Staphyleaceae.In: Flora Malesiana6(1): 49–53.
Lindley, J. 1833. The vegetable kingdom. Third edition. London.
-. 1836. A natural system of botany. London.
-. 1846. The vegetable kingdom. London.
Lindsey, A. A. 1938. Anatomical evidence for the Menyanthaceae. Amer. J. Bot.25: 480–485.
Litchfield, W. H. 1966. The pollen morphology of Australian Sterculieae. Pollen et Spores8: 439–453.
Lobreau, D. 1969. Les limites de l’“ordre” de Célastrales d’après le pollen. Pollen et Spores11: 499–555.
Lobreau-Callen, D. 1975. Les pollens des Célastrales et groupes apparentés. Thésis Montpellier, C. N. R. S. No. A. O. 8071.
—. 1977. Nouvelle interpretation de 1’“ordre” de Célastrales, à l’aide de la palynologie. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci.D284(11): 915–918.
—,S. Nilsson, F. Albers andH. Straka. 1978. Les Cneoraceae (Rutales): étude taxonomique, palynologique et systématique. Grana17: 127–139.
Long, A. G. 1960. On the structure ofCalymmatotheca kidstonii Calder (emended) andGenomosperma latens gen. et sp. nov. from the calciferous sandstone series of Berwickshire. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh64: 29–44.
—. 1966. Some lower carboniferous fructifications from Berwickshire, together with a theoretical account of the evolution of ovules, cupules and carpels. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb.66: 345–375.
Lotsy, J. P. 1911. Vortrage über botanische Stemmesgeschichte. Bd. 3. Teil 1. Cormophyta Siphonogamia. Jena.
Lowe, J. 1961. The phylogeny of monocotyledons. New Phytol.60: 355–387.
Mabry, T. J. andH.-D. Behnke. 1976. Betalains and P-type sieve-element plastids,Drysphania. Taxon25: 109–111.
—— andI. J. Eifert. 1976. Betalains and P-type sieve-element plastids inGisekia L. (Antrospermae). Taxon25: 112–114.
—,I. J. Eifert, C. Chang, H. Mabry, C. Kidd andH.-D. Behnke. 1975. Theligonaceae: pigment and ultrastructural evidence which excludes it from the order Centrospermae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol.3: 53–55.
— andB. L. Turner. 1964. Chemical investigations of the Batidaceae. Betaxanthins and their systematic implications. Taxon13: 197–200.
Maguire, B., P. S. Ashton, C. de Zeeuw, D. E. Giannasi andK. J. Nicklas. 1977. Pakaraimoideae, Dipterocarpaceae of the Western Hemisphere. Taxon26: 341–385.
-and J. M. Pires. 1978. Saccifoliaceae. A new monotypic family of the Gentianales. Pp. 230–244In: B. Maguire and collaborators, The botany of the Guayana Highland—Part X. Mem. New York Bot. Gard.29: 1–288.
Maheshwari, D. H. 1972. Salvadoraceae. A study of its embryology and systematics. J. Indian Bot. Soc.51: 56–62.
Maheshwari, J. K. 1961. The genusWightia Wall, in India with a discussion on its systematic position. Bull. Bot. Surv. India3: 31–35.
Maheshwari, P. 1945. The place of angiosperm embryology in research and teaching. J. Indian Bot. Soc.24: 25–41.
—. 1950. An introduction to the embryology of angiosperms. McGraw-Hill. New York, London.
Mallick, R. andA. K. Sharma. 1966. Chromosome studies in Indian Pandanales. Cytologia31: 402–410.
Maout, E. le and J. Decaisne. 1868. Traité général de botanique descriptive et analytique. Paris.
Marsden, M. P. F. andI. W. Bailey. 1955. A fourth type of nodal anatomy in dicotyledons, illustrated byClerodendron trichotomum Thunb. J. Arnold Arbor.36: 1–50.
Martin, A. C. 1946. The comparative internal morphology of seeds. Amer. Midl. Nat.36: 513–660.
Matthiessen, A. 1962. A contribution to the embryology ofPaeonia. Acta Horti Berg.20: 57–61.
Mauritzon, J. 1933a. Studien über die Embryologie der Familien Crassulaceae und Saxifragaceae. Diss., Lund.
—. 1933b. Über die systematische Stellung der Familien Hydrostachyaceae und Podostemaceae. Bot. Not.1933: 172–180.
—. 1939. Contribution to the embryology of the orders Rosales and Myrtales. Acta Univ. Lund (2)35: 1–121.
Maury, G, J. Müller andB. Lugardon. 1975. Notes on the morphology and fine structure of the exine of some pollen types in Dipterocarpaceae. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.19: 241–289.
Mayr, E. 1969. Principles of systematic zoology. McGraw-Hill. New York.
—. 1976. Evolution and the diversity of life. Selected Essays. Harvard Univ. Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Melikian, A. P. 1968. Position of the families Buxaceae and Simmondsiaceae in the system. Bot. Zhurn.53: 1043–1047. (In Russian.)
—. 1973. Seed coat types of Hamamelidaceae and allied families in relation to their systematics. Bot. Zhurn.58: 350–359. (In Russian.)
Metcalfe, C. R. 1952. The anatomical structure of the Dioncophyllaceae, in relation to the taxonomic affinities of the family. Kew Bull.1951: 351–368.
—. 1956.Scyphostegia borneensis Stapf. Anatomy of stem and leaf in relation to its taxonomic position. Reinwardtia4: 99–104.
—. 1971. Cyperaceae. Vol. 5.In: C. R. Metcalfe (ed.). Anatomy of the monocotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
— andL. Chalk. 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons.I-II. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
Meyer, N. R. 1977. Comparative morphological studies of the development and ultrastructure of the gymnosperms and primitive angiosperms. Thesis of doctoral dissertation. Leningrad. (In Russian)
— andA. S. Yaroshevskaya. 1976. The phylogenetic significance of the development of pollen grain walls in Liliaceae, Juncaceae and Cyperaceae.In: I. K. Ferguson and J. Müller (eds.). The evolutionary significance of the exine, pp. 91–95. (Linn. Soc. Symp. Ser. No. 1.) Academic Press, London and New York.
Milby, T. H. 1971. Floral anatomy ofKrameria lanceolata. Amer. J. Bot.58: 569–576.
Mildbraed, J. 1908. Stylidiaceae.In: A. Engler (ed.). Das Pflanzenreich, IV;278: 1–98. Leipzig.
Miller, R. B. 1975. Systematic anatomy of the xylem and comments on the relationships of Flacourtiaceae. J. Arnold Arbor.56: 20–102.
Mirande, M. 1922. Sur l’origine morphologique du liber interne des Nolanacées et la position systématique de cette famille. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci.175: 375–376.
Mohana Rao, P. R. 1974. Seed anatomy in some Hamamelidaceae and phylogeny. Phytomorphology24(1-2): 113–139.
Money, L., I. W. Bailey andB. G. L. Swamy. 1950. The morphology and relationships of the Monimiaceae. J. Arnold Arbor.31: 372–404.
Moore, H. E. 1973. The major groups of palms and their distribution. Gentes Herb.11: 27–141.
— andN. W. Uhl. 1973. Palms and the origin and evolution of monocotyledons. Quart. Rev. Biol.48: 414–436.
Moseley, M. F. 1948. Comparative anatomy and phylogeny of the Casuarinaceae. Bot. Gaz.110: 232–280.
—. 1958. Morphological studies in the Nymphaeaceae. I. The nature of the stamens. Phytomorphology8: 1–29.
—. 1971. Morphological studies of Nymphaeaceae. VI. Development of flower ofNuphar. Phytomorphology21: 253–283.
—. 1974. Vegetative anatomy and morphology of Amentiferae. Brittonia25: 356–370.
Mújica, M. B. andD. F. Cutler. 1974. Taxonomic implications of anatomical studies on the Oliniaceae. Kew Bull.29: 93–123.
Muller, J. 1969. Pollen morphological notes on Ochnaceae. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.9: 149–173.
—. 1970. Palynological evidence on early differentiation of angiosperms. Biol. Rev.45: 417–450.
—. 1975. Pollen morphology of Crypteroniaceae. Blumea22: 275–294.
— andP. W. Leenhouts. 1976. Pollen types in Sapindaceae in relation to taxonomy.In: I. K. Ferguson and J. Müller (eds.). The evolutionary significance of the exine, pp. 407–445. (Linn. Soc. Symp. Ser. No. 1.) Academic Press. London and New York.
Müller-Doblies, D. 1970. Über die Verwandtschaft vonTypha undSparganium im Infloreszens- und Blütenbau. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.89: 451–562.
Müller-Doblies, U. 1969. Über die Blütenstande und Blüten sowie zur Embryologie vonSparganium. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.89: 359–450.
Nägeli, C. von. 1884. Mechanisch-physiologische Theorie der Abstammungslehre. München und Leipzig.
Nair, P. K. K. 1967. Pollen morphology with reference to the taxonomy and phylogeny of the Monochlamydeae. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.3: 81–91.
— andM. Sharma. 1965. Pollen morphology of Liliaceae. J. Palyn. (Lucknow)1: 39–61.
Nakai, T. 1942. Notulae ad plantas Asiae orientalis. XVIII. J. Jap. Bot.18: 91–120.
-. 1943. Ordines, familiae, tribi, sectiones, species, varietates, formae et combinationes novae a Prof. Nakai-Takenoschin adhuc ut novis edita. Appendix. Questiones characterium naturalium plantarum, etc. Tokyo.
Narayana, H. S. 1970. Moringaceae. Bull. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad.41: 78–83.
Narayana, N. S. 1962. Studies in the Capparidaceae. I. The embryology ofCapparis decidua (Forsk.) Pax. Phytomorphology12: 167–177.
Narayana, L. L. andDigamber Rao. 1971. Contribution to the floral anatomy of Linaceae II. Phytomorphology21: 64–67.
Němejc, F. 1956. On the problem of the origin and phylogenetic development of the angiosperms. Acta Musei Natl. Prag.12B: 65–144.
Netolizky, F. 1926. Anatomie der Angiospermem-Samen. Boerntraeger. Berlin.
Newman, I. V. 1928. The life history ofDoryanthes excelsa. Part. 1. Some ecological and vegetative features and spore production. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales. LII,5: 499–538.
Nicely, K. A. 1965. A monographic study of the Calycanthaceae. Castanea30: 38–81.
Novák, F. A. 1961. Vyšši rostliny. Praha.
Nowicke, J. W. 1975. Preliminary survey of pollen morphology in the order Centrospermae. Grana15: 51–77.
Nozeran, R. 1955. Contribution à l’étude de quelques structures florales. Ann. Sci. Bot. Sér. 11,10: 1–244.
Ozenda, P. 1949. Recherches sur le Dicotylédones apocarpiques. Contribution à l’étude des Angiospermes dites primitives. Masson. Paris.
—. 1952. Remarques sur quelques interprétations de l’étamine. Phytomorphology2: 225–231.
Padmanabhan, D. 1960. The embryology ofAvicennia officinalis. 1. Floral morphology and gametophytes. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B.52: 131–145.
—. 1964. The embryology ofAvicennia officinalis. 2. Endosperm. Phytomorphology14: 442–451.
—. 1970. Verbenaceae. Bull. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad.41: 250–254.
Paliwal, G. S. 1969. Stomatal ontogeny and phylogeny. I. Monocotyledons. Acta Bot. Neerl.18: 654–668.
Palser, B. F. 1963. Studies of floral morphology in the Ericales. 6. The Diapensiaceae. Bot. Gaz.124: 200–219.
Plant, D. D. 1965. On the ontogeny of stomata and other homologous structures. Plant Sci. Ser. Allahabad,1: 1–24.
—,D. D. Nautiyal andSudha Singh. 1974. The cuticle, epidermis and stomatal ontogeny ofCasuarina equisetifolia Forst. Ann. Bot.39: 1117–1123.
Parkin, J. 1914. The evolution of the inflorescence. J. Linn. Soc., Bot.42: 511–553.
—. 1923. The strobilus theory of angiospermous descent. Proc. Linn. Soc. London153: 51–64.
—. 1953. The durian theory—a criticism. Phytomorphology3: 80–88.
—. 1955. A plea for a simpler gynoecium. Phytomorphology5: 46–57.
Patel, R. N. 1973. Wood anatomy of the dicotyledons indigenous to New Zealand. 2. Escalloniaceae. New Zealand J. Bot.11: 421–434.
Paterson, B. R. 1961. Studies of floral morphology in the Epacridaceae. Bot. Gaz.122(4): 259–279.
Pax, F. 1889. Caryophyllaceae.In: A. Engler und K. Prantl (eds.). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 3(1b): 61–94.
-. 1896. Euphorbiaceae.In: A. Engler und K. Prantl (eds.). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 3(5): 1–119.
Payne, W. W. andJ. L. Seago. 1968. The open conduplicate carpel ofAkebia quinata (Berberidales: Lardizabalaceae). Amer. J. Bot.55: 575–581.
Penning von, T. D. andB. T. Styles. 1975. A generic monograph of the Meliaceae. Blumea22: 419–540.
Perrier de la Bâthie, H. 1942. Au sujet des affinités desBrexia et des Celastracées et de deuxBrexia nouveaux de Madagascar. Bull. Soc. Bot. France89: 219–221.
Petersen, F. P. andD. E. Fairbrothers. 1979. Serological investigation of selected amentiferous taxa. Systematic Botany4(3): 230–241.
Pettit, J. 1970. Heterospory and the origin of the seed habit. Biol. Rev.45: 401–415.
Philipson, W. R. 1967.Griselinia Forst, fil.—Anomaly or link. New Zealand J. Bot.5: 134–165.
—. 1974. Ovular morphology and the major classification of the dicotyledons. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.68: 89–108.
—. 1975. Evolutionary lines within the dicotyledons. New Zealand J. Bot.13: 73–91.
—. 1977. Ovular morphology and the classification of dicotyledons. Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl.1: 123–140.
— andM. N. Philipson. 1973. A comparison of the embryology ofForstera L. andDonatia J. R. et G. Forst. New Zealand J. Bot.11: 449–459.
Piechura, J. E. andD. Fairbrothers. 1979. Serological investigation of the Oleaceae and putative relatives. Bot. Soc. Amer. Misc. Ser. Publ.157: 65.
Pfeiffer, H. H. 1951.Lophopyxis als typus einer Eigenen familie. Revista Sudamer. Bot.10: 3–6.
Pijl, L. van der. 1955. Sarcotesta, aril, pulpa and the evolution of the angiosperm fruit. I, II. Proc. Ned. Acad. Wet. C58(2): 154–161; 58(3): 307–312.
—. 1960. Ecological aspects of flower evolution. I. Phyletic evolution. Evolution14: 403–416.
—. 1961. Ecological aspects of flower evolution. II. Zoophilous flower classes. Evolution15: 44–59.
—. 1969. Principles of dispersal in higher plants. Springer. New York.
Pilger, R. 1935. Santalaceae.In: A. Engler und K. Prantl (eds.). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Zweite Auflage.16B: 52–91.
Pires, J. M. andW. A. Rodrigues. 1971. Notas sôbre os gênerasPolygonanthus eAnisophyllea. Acta Amazonica1(2): 7–15.
Planchon, J. E. 1848. Sur la famille des Droséracées. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Sér. 3,9: 185–207.
—. 1854. Affinités et synonymie de quelques genres nouveaux. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Sér. 4,2: 256–266.
Plouvier, V. 1959. Sur la recherche des hétérosides cyanogénétiques et de itols chez quelques Saxifragacées: presence d’allitol chez lesItea. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci.249: 2828–2830.
—. 1965. Recherche d’hétérosides chez quelques Saxifragacées; le deutzioside, composé nouveau isolé desDeutzia; la présence de skimmine chez lesHydrangea. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci.261: 4268–4271.
Posluszny, U. andR. Sattler. 1976. Floral development ofZannichellia palustris. Canad. J. Bot.54(8): 651–662.
Pragolowski, J. 1974. The pollen morphology of the Trochodendraceae, Tetracentraceae, Crcidiphyllaceae and Eupteleaceae with reference to taxonomy. Pollen et Spores16(4): 449–467.
Prakash, N. andE. J. McAlister. 1977. An embryological study ofBauern capitata with comments on the systematic position ofBauera. Austral. J. Bot.25: 615–622.
Prance, G. T. 1965. The systematic position ofStylobasium Desf. Bull. Jard. Bot. État35: 435–448.
—. 1968. The systematic position ofRhabdodendron Gilg et Pilg. Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg.38: 127–146.
Prantl, K. 1887. Beiträge zur Morphologie und Systematik der Ranunculaceen. Bot. Jb.9: 225–273.
Presting, D. 1965. Zur Morphologie der Pollenkörner der Passifloraceen. Pollen et Spores7: 193–247.
Price, J. R. 1952. The chemical constituents ofFlindersia. Austral. J. Sci. Res.54: 387–400.
Prijanto, B. 1970. Batidaceae. World pollen flora3: 1–11.
Pritzel, E. 1898. Die Systematische Wert der Samenanatomie, insbesondere des Endosperms bei den Pariétales. Bot. Jb.24: 345–394.
Puff, C. andA. Weber. 1976. Contributions to the morphology, anatomy, and karyology ofRhabdodendron, and a reconsideration of the systematic position of the Rhabdodendronaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol.125: 195–222.
Pulle, A. A. 1938, 1952. Compendium van de terminologie, nomenclatuur en systematick der saadplanten. Utrecht.
Punt, W. andP. W. Leenhouts. 1967. Pollen morphology and taxonomy in the Loganiaceae. Grana Palynol.7: 469–516.
Puri, V. 1952. Placentation in angiosperms. Bot. Rev.18: 603–651.
Radlkofer, L. 1890. Über die Gliederung der Familie der Sapindaceen. Sitzungsber. Math.-Phys. Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. München20: 105–319.
-. 1931–1934. Sapindaceae.In: A. Engler, ed., Das Pflanzenreich, IV: 165. (Heft 98a).
Radulescu, D. 1970. Recherches morpho-palynologiques sur les espèces l’Iridaceae. Lucr. Grad. Bot. Bucuresti1970: 311–350.
—. 1973a. Contributions morpho-palynologiques concernant quelques Liliiflorae. Lucr. Grad. Bot. Bucuresti.1972–1973: 87–104.
—. 1973b. La morphologie du pollen chez quelques Haemodoraceae. Lucr. Grad. Bot. Bucuresti.1972–1973: 123–132.
—. 1973c. Recherches morpho-palynologiques sur la famille Liliaceae. Lucr. Grad. Bot. Bucuresti.1972–1973: 133–248.
—. 1973d. Liliiflorae. Discussions et considérations phylogénétiques à l’aide de quelques recherches morphologiques. Lucr. Grad. Bot. Bucuresti.1972–1973: 249–283.
Rao, V. S. 1969. The floral anatomy and relationship of the rare Apostasias. J. Indian Bot. Soc.68: 374–385.
—. 1974. The relationships of the Apostasiaceae on the basis of floral anatomy. J. Linn. Soc., Bot.68: 319–327.
Rauh, W. andI. Jäger-Zürn. 1966. Zur Kenntnis der Hydrostachyaceae. I. Blütenmorphologische und embryologische Untersuchungen an Hydrostachyaceen unter besonderer Berücksichtung ihrer systematischen Stellung. Sitzungsber. Heidelberger Akad. Wiss., Math.-Naturwiss. Kl.1966(1): 1–117.
Raven, P. H. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: Cytology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 724–764.
Reitsma, T. 1970. Pollen morphology of the Alangiaceae. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.10: 249–332.
Rendle, A. B. 1930, 1938. The classification of flowering plants. I., II. 2nd ed. Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambridge.
—. 1963. The classification of flowering plants. Cambridge University Press, England.
Rensch, B. 1959. Evolution above the species level. Columbia Univ. Press. New York.
Ritchie, E., J. A. Bosson andM. Rasmussen. 1963. The chemical constituents of AustralianFlindersia spp. Australian J. Chem.16: 480–490.
Robertson, C. 1904. The structure of the flowers and the mode of pollination of the primitive angiosperms. Bot. Gaz.37: 294–298.
Robyns, A., S. Nilsson andR. Dechamps. 1977. Sur la position systématique du genreMaxwellia Baillon. Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg.47: 145–153.
Rock, B. N. 1972. The woods and flora of the Florida Keys: “Pinnatae.” Smithsonian Contrib. Bot. 5, Washington.
Rodriguez, R. L. 1971. The relationships of the Umbellales.In: V. H. Heywood, ed., The biology and chemistry of the Umbelliferae, pp. 63–91. Academic Press. London.
Roh weder, O. 1969. Beiträge zur Blütenmorphologie und -anatomie der Commelinaceen mit Anmerkungen zur Begrenzung und Gliederung der Familie. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges.79: 199–220.
Rolfe, R. A. 1909. The evolution of the Orchidaceae. Orchid Rev.17: 129–132; 193–196; 289–292; 353–356.
—. 1910. The evolution of the Orchidaceae. Orchid Rev.18: 33–36; 87–99; 129–132; 162–166; 289–294; 321–325.
Romanov, I. D. 1971. Types of development of embryo sac of the angiosperms.In: V. P. Zosimovich (ed.), Problems in embryology (Kiev). (In Russian), pp. 72–113.
Rosén, W. 1935. Beiträge zur Embryologie der Stylidiaceen. Bot. Not.1935: 273–278.
—. 1946. Further notes on the embryology of the Goodeniaceae. Acta Horti Gothob.16: 235–249.
—. 1949. Endosperm development in Campanulaceae and closely related families. Bot. Not.1949: 137–147.
Rowley, J. R. andG. Erdtman. 1967. Sporoderm inPopulus andSalix. Grana Palynol.7(2-3): 517–567.
Sands, M. J. 1973. New aspects of the floral vascular anatomy in some members of the order Rhoeadales sensu Hutch. Kew Bull.28(2): 211–256.
Sastri, R. L. N. 1969. Floral morphology, embryology, and relationships of the Berberidaceae. Austral. J. Bot.17: 69–79.
Sâto, D. 1942. Karyotype alteration and phylogeny in Liliaceae and allied families. Jap. J. Bot.12: 57–161.
Sato, Y. 1972. Development of the embryo sac ofDaphniphyllum macropodum var.humile (Maxim.) Rosenth. Sci. Rep. Tôhoku Univ. ser. 4 (Biol.)36: 129–133.
Savile, D. B. O. 1979. Fungi as aids in higher plant classification. Bot. Rev.45: 377–503.
Sawada, M. 1971. Floral vascularization ofPaeonia japonica with some consideration on systematic position of the Paeoniaceae. Bot. Mag. Tokyo84: 51–60.
Sax, K. andD. A. Kribs. 1930. Chromosomes and phylogeny in Caprifoliaceae. J. Arnold Arbor.11: 147–153.
Schaeffer, J. 1972. Pollen morphology of the genusHydnocarpus (Flacourtiaceae) with notes on related genera. Blumea20: 65–87.
Schaffner, J. H. 1929. Principles of plant taxonomy, VII. Ohio J. Sci.29(5): 243–252.
—. 1934. Phylogenetic taxonomy of plants. Quart. Rev. Biol.9: 129–160.
Schlittler, J. 1949. Die Systematische Stellung vonPetermannia F. v. Muell. und ihre phylogenetischen Beziehungen zu den Luzuriagoideae Engl. und den Dioscoreaceae Lindl. Vierteljahrsschr. Naturf. Ges. Zürich 94, Beih. No.1: 1–28.
Schmid, R. 1964. Die systematische Stellung der Dioncophyllaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.83: 1–56.
Schneider, E. L. 1978. Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae. IX. The seed ofBarclaya longifolia Wall. Bot. Gaz.139: 223–230.
Schofield, E. K. 1968. Petiole anatomy of the Guttiferae and related families. Mem. New York Bot. Gard.18: 1–55.
Schraudolf, H., B. Schmidt andF. Weberling. 1972. Das Vorkommen von “Myrosinase” als Hinweis auf die systematische Stellung der Batidaceae. Experientia72: 1090–1091.
Schulze, W. 1978. Beiträge zur Taxonomie der Liliifloren. III. Alstroemeriaceae. Wiss. Z. Friedrich-Schiller Univ. Jena. Math. Naturwiss.27,1: 79–85.
Schurhoff, P. N. 1926. Zur Pleiophyllie der Sympetalen auf Grund ihrer Haplotenentwicklung. Rep. Spec. Nov. Reg. Veg. Beih.41: 1–14.
Schwartz, O. 1926. Anatomische, morphologische und systematische Untersuchungen über die Pontederiaceae. Beih. Bot.42(1): 263–320.
-. 1930. Pontederiaceae.In: A. Engler und K. Prantl. Die natürlichen Pflanzanfamilien.15a: 181–188.
Sen, S. 1975. Cytotaxonomy of Liliales. Feddes Repert.86: 255–305.
Sengupta, S. 1972. On the pollen morphology of Convolvulaceae with special reference to taxonomy. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.13: 157–212.
Sewertzoff, A. N. 1931. Morphologische Gesetzmässigkeiten der Evolution. Jena.
Shah, C. K. 1962. Pollen development in some members of the Cyperaceae.In: Plant embryology. A symposium, 1960. CSIR, New Delhi, 81–93.
—. 1967. A taxonomic evaluation of the families Cyperaceae and Juncaceae. Bull. Natl. Inst. Sci. India34: 248–256.
Sharma, A. K. 1964. Cytology as an aid in taxonomy. Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal18(1-2): 1–4.
-. 1969. Evolution and taxonomy of monocotyledons.In: C. D. Darlington, ed., Chromosomes Today2: 241–249.
— andM. Chaudhuri. 1964. Cytological studies as an aid in assessing the status ofSansevieria, Ophiopogon andCurculigo. The Nucleus7: 43–58.
Sharma, B. D. 1969. Pollen morphology of Tiliaceae in relation to plant taxonomy. J. Palynol.5(1): 7–29.
Shaw, H. K. Airy. 1973. Greyiaceae.In: J. C. Willis, A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns, 8th ed. P. 511. University Press, Cambridge.
—,D. F. Cutler andS. Nilsson. 1973.Pottingeria, its taxonomic position, anatomy and palynology. Kew Bull.28: 97–104.
Shen, Y.-F. 1954. Phylogeny and wood anatomy ofNandina. Taiwania5: 85–92.
Shilkina, I. A. 1977. The comparative anatomy of the wood of the genusOncotheca (order Theales). Bot. Zhurn.62: 1273–1275.
Simon, J.-P. 1971. Comparative serology of the order Nymphaeales. II. Relationships of Nymphaeaceae and Nelumbonaceae. Aliso7: 325–350.
Singh, S. P. 1970. Pedaliaceae.In: Symposium on comparative embryology of angiosperms. Bull. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad.41: 273–277.
Singh, V. 1965. Morphological and anatomical studies in Helobiae. II. Vascular anatomy of the flower of Potamogetonaceae. Bot. Gaz.126(2): 137–144.
— andR. Sattler. 1972. Floral development ofAlis ma triviale. Canad. J. Bot.50: 619–627.
——. 1974. Floral development ofButomus umbellatus. Canad. J. Bot.52: 223–230.
Sinnott, E. W. 1914. Investigations on the phylogeny of the angiosperm. I. The anatomy of the node as an aid in the classification of angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot.1: 303–322.
— andI. W. Bailey. 1914. Investigations on the phylogeny of the angiosperms: No. 4. The origin and dispersal of herbaceous angiosperms. Ann. Bot.28: 547–600.
Skottsberg, C. 1935. Myzodendraceae.In: A. Engler und K. Prantl, Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 2nd ed.16b: 92–97.
Skvarla, J. J., B. L. Turner, V. C. Patel andA. S. Tomb. 1977. Pollen morphology in the Compositae and in morphologically related families.In: V. H. Heywood and J. B. Harborne, eds., The biology and chemistry of the Compositae,1: 141–259. Academic Press. London, New York, San Francisco.
Sleumer, H. 1970. Le genreParopsia Noronha ex Thouars (Passifloraceae). Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg.40: 49–75.
Small, J. 1919. The origin and development of the Compositae. Reprinted from New Phytol. vols.16-18, 1917–1919.
Smith, A. C. 1945. Geographical distribution of the Winteraceae. J. Arnold Arbor.26: 48–59.
—. 1971 [1972]. An appraisal of the orders and families of primitive extant angiosperms. J. Indian Bot. Soc., Golden Jubilee Vol.50A: 215–226.
Smith, L. B. 1934. Geographical evidence on the lines of evolution in the Bromeliaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.66: 446–468.
Smithson, E. 1957. The comparative anatomy of the Flagellariaceae. Kew Bull.1956: 491–501.
Smith-White, S. 1959. Cytological evolution in the Australian flora. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.24: 273–289.
Solms-Laubach, H. 1883. Pontederiaceae.In: A. De Candolle. Monographie phanerogamarum. Paris.4: 501–535.
Soó, R. 1967. Die modernen Systeme der Angiospermen. Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hungaricae13: 201–233.
Sporne, K. R. 1972. Some observations on the evolution of pollen types in dicotyledons. New Phytol.71: 181–185.
Srivastava, L. M. 1970. The secondary phloem ofAustrobaileya scandens. Canad. J. Bot.48: 341–359.
Stant, M. Y. 1970. Anatomy ofPetrosavia stellaris Becc., a saprophytic monocotyledon.In: N. K. B. Robson et al., eds., New research in plant anatomy, pp. 147–161. Suppl. 1, J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 63. Academic Press. London and New York.
Stebbins, G. L. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Addison-Wesley. Reading, Mass.
—. 1974. Flowering plants. Evolution above the species level. E. Arnold. London.
— andG. S. Khush. 1961. Variation in the organization of the stomatal complex in the leaf epidermis of monocotyledons and its bearing on their phylogeny. Amer. J. Bot.48: 51–59.
Stern, W. L., G. K. Brizicky andR. H. Eyde. 1969. Comparative anatomy and relationships of Columelliaceae. J. Arnold Arbor.50: 36–75.
Stevens, P. F. 1971. A classification of Ericaceae: subfamilies and tribes. J. Linn. Soc. London, Bot.64: 1–53.
Stevens, R. A. andE. S. Martin. 1978. A new ontogenetic classification of stomatal types. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.77: 53–64.
Stone, D. E. andC. R. Broome. 1971. Pollen ultrastructure: evidence for relationship of the Juglandaceae and the Rhoipteleaceae. Pollen et Spores13(1): 5–14.
Stopes, M. 1905. On the double nature of the cycadean integument. Ann. Bot.19: 561–566.
Straka, H. 1963. Über die mögliche phylogenetische Bedeutung der Pollenmorphologie der madagassischenBubbia perrieri R. Cap. (Winteraceae). Grana Palyn.4: 355–360.
—. 1967. Die Pollenmorphologie einiger Madagassischer Pflanzenfamilien und ihre Darstellung in Pollenformeln und auf Lochkarten. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.3: 93–103.
—. 1975. Pollen- und Sporenkunde. Fischer. Stuttgart.
— andF. Albers. 1978. Die Pollenmorphologie vonDiegodendron humbertii R. Capuron. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.99: 363–369.
—— andA. Mondon. 1976. Die Stellung und Gliederung der Familie Cneoraceae (Rutales). Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen52: 267–310.
Subramanyam, K. 1950a. Development of embryo sac and endosperm inStylidium tenellum. Curr. Sci.19: 294.
—. 1950b. An embryological study ofLevenhookia dubia. Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India B.16: 245–253.
—. 1951a. On the probable origin of the unilocular ovary of the Compositae from the Stylidiaceae. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.33B: 327–330.
—. 1951b. A morphological study ofStylidium graminifolium. Lloydia14: 65–81.
—. 1953. The nutritional mechanism of embryo sac and embryo in the families Campanulaceae, Lobeliaceae and Stylidiaceae. J. Mysore Univ. B.13: 1–4.
-. 1962. Embryology in relation to systematic botany with particular references to the Crassulaceae.In: Plant embryology. A symposium. Pp. 94–112. New Delhi.
—. 1970a. Pentaphragmataceae. Bull. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad.41: 317–320.
—. 1970b. Stylidiaceae. Bull. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad.41: 321–324.
Suessenguth, K. 1927. Über die GattungLennoa. Flora122: 264–305.
Swamy, B. G. L. 1948. A contribution to the life history ofCasuarina. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts77(1): 1–32.
—. 1949. Further contributions to the morphology of the Degeneriaceae. J. Arnold Arbor.30: 10–38.
Swamy, R. L. N. 1969. Comparative morphology and phylogeny of the Ranales. Biol. Rev.44: 291–319.
Takhtajan, A. 1942. The structural types of gynoecium and placentation. Bull. Armen. Branch Acad. Sci. USSR,3-4 (17–18): 91–112 (in Russian with English summary).
—. 1943. Correlations of ontogeny and phylogeny in the higher plants. [In Russian with English summary]. Trudy Erevan State Univ.22: 71–176.
-. 1948. Morphological evolution of the angiosperms. Moscow. (In Russian).
—. 1950. Phylogenetic principles of the system of higher plants. Bot. Zh. (Leningrad)35: 113–135 (In Russian). English translation: Bot. Rev. 1953,19: 1–45.
-. 1954. The origin of angiospermous plants. Moscow. (In Russian).
—. 1957. On the origin of temperate flora of Eurasia. Bot. Zh. (Leningrad)42: 1635–1653 (In Russian with English summary).
—. 1959. Die Evolution der Angiospermen. Fischer. Jena.
-. 1964. Foundations of the evolutionary morphology of angiosperms. Moscow and Leningrad (in Russian).
—. 1966. A system and phylogeny of the flowering plants. Nauka. Moscow and Leningrad. (In Russian).
—. 1969. Flowering plants. Origin and dispersal. Oliver and Boyd. Edinburgh.
-. 1970. The origin and dispersal of flowering plants. “Nauka” Leningrad. (In Russian).
—. 1973. Evolution und Ausbreitung der Blütenpflanzen. Fischer. Stuttgart.
—. 1976. Neoteny and the origin of flowering plants.In: C. B. Beck (ed.), Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. Columbia Univ. Press. New York, pp. 207–219.
Takhtajan, A. L. andN. R. Meyer. 1976. Some additional data on the pollen morphology ofDegeneria vitiensis. Bot. Zh. (Leningrad)61: 1531–1534 (in Russian with English summary).
Tamura, M. 1963. Morphology, ecology and phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae, I. Sci. Reports, Osaka Univ.11: 115–126.
—. 1972. Morphology and phyletic relationship of the Glaucidiaceae. Bot. Mag. Tokyo85: 29–41.
Taylor, F. H. 1972. The secondary xylem of the Violaceae: a comparative study. Bot. Gaz.133: 230–242.
Terekhin, E. S. 1962. On the development of embryo in some Pyroleae-Monotropoideae. Bot. Zh.47: 1811–1816. (In Russian).
Thanikaimoni, G. andG. Vasanthy. 1972. Sarraceniaceae: Palynology and systematics. Pollen et Spores14: 143–155.
Thomas, J. L. 1960. A monographic study of the Cyrillaceae. Contr. Gray Herb.186: 1–114.
Thorne, R. F. 1968. Synopsis of a putative phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso6: 57–66.
—. 1973. Inclusion of the Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) in the Araliaceae. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh32: 161–165.
—. 1974a. A phylogenetic classification of the Annoniflorae. Aliso8(2): 147–209.
—. 1974b. The “Amentiferae” or Hamamelidae as an artificial group: A summary statement. Brittonia25: 395–405.
—. 1976. A phylogenetic classification of the Angiospermae. Evol. Biol.9: 35–106.
—. 1977. Some realignments in the Angiospermae. Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl.1: 299–319.
Tiagi, B. 1951. A contribution to the morphology and embryology ofCuscuta hyalina andC. planiflora. Phytomorphology1: 9–21.
—. 1956. A contribution to the embryology ofStriga orobanchoides Benth. andStriga euphmsioides Benth. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club83: 154–170.
—. 1963. Studies in the family Orobanchaceae. IV. Embryology ofBoschniackia himalaica andB. tuberosa, with remarks on the evolution of the family. Bot. Not.116: 81–93.
—. 1970. Orobanchaceae. Bull. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad.41: 282–289.
Tiagi, Y. D. and Kshetrapal Shashikala. 1972. Studies on the floral anatomy, evolution of the gynoecium and relationships of the family Loganiaceae. Advances in plant morphology, pp. 408–416. Meerut.
Tippo, O. 1938. Comparative anatomy of the Moraceae and their allies. Bot. Gaz.100: 1–99.
Tomlinson, P. B. 1962. Phylogeny of the Scitamineae—morphological and anatomical considerations. Evolution16: 192–213.
—. 1965. Notes on the anatomy ofAphyllanthes (Liliaceae) and comparison of Eriocaulaceae. J. Linn. Soc. London, Bot.59: 163–173.
—. 1969a. On the morphology and anatomy of turtle grass,Thalassia testudinum (Hydrocharitaceae). III. Floral morphology and anatomy. Bull. Marine Sci.19(2): 286–305.
—. 1969b. Commelinales-Zingiberales. Vol. 3 of C. R. Metcalfe, ed., Anatomy of the monocotyledons. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
—. 1974. Development of the stomatal complex as a taxonomic character in monocotyledons. Taxon23: 109–128.
— andE. S. Ayensu. 1968. Morphology and anatomy ofCroomia pauciflora (Stemonaceae). J. Arnold Arbor.49: 260–275.
——. 1969. Notes on the vegetative morphology and anatomy of the Petermanniaceae (Monocotyledones). J. Linn. Soc., Bot.62: 17–26.
Traub, H. P. 1963. The genera of Amaryllidaceae. Amer. Plant Life Soc., La Jolla, Calif.
—. 1968. The subgenera, sections and subsections ofAllium L. Plant Life24: 147–163.
—. 1972a. The order Alliales. Pl. Life28: 129–132.
—. 1972b. Tribe Hosteae, family Agavaceae. Pl. Life28: 137–138.
Troll, W. 1928. Organisation und Gestalt in Bereich der Blute. Berlin.
—. 1931. Beitrage zur Morphologie des Gynaeceums. I. Über das Gynaeceum der Hydrocharitaceen. Planta14: 1–18.
Tsukada, M. 1964. Pollen morphology and identification. III. Modern and fossil tropical pollen with emphasis on Bombacaceae. Pollen et Spores6: 393–462.
Tucker, S. C. 1974. Whorled initiation of stamens and carpels inSaururus cernuus. Amer. J. Bot.61: 66 (Abstr.).
—. 1975. Floral development inSaururus cernuus. I. Floral initiation and stamen development. Amer. J. Bot.62: 993–1007.
—. 1976. Floral development inSaururus cernuus. II. Carpel initiation and floral vasculature. Amer. J. Bot.63: 289–301.
Tucker, W. G. 1969. Serotaxonomy of the Solanaceae: A preliminary survey. Ann. Bot.33: 1–23.
Uhl, N. W. andH. E. Moore. 1971. The palm gynoecium. Amer. J. Bot.58: 945–992.
Van Tieghem, Ph. 1897. Sur les caractères et les affinités des Grubbiacées. J. Bot. (Paris)11: 127–238.
Vaughan, J. G. 1970. The structure and utilization of oil seeds. Chapman & Hall. London.
Vani-Hardev. 1972. Systematic embryology ofRoridula gorgonias Planch. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen48: 339–351.
Veillet-Bartoszewska, M. 1960. Ericacées. Developpement de l’embryon chez leLedum palustre L. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci.251: 5.
Verlaque, R. 1977. Rapports entre les Valerianaceae, les Morinaceae et les Dipsacaceae. Bull. Soc. Bot. France124: 475–482.
Vijayaraghavan, M. R. 1965. Morphology and embryology ofActinidia polygama Franch et Sav. and systematic position of the family Actinidiaceae. Phytomorphology15: 224–235.
—. 1969. Studies in the family Cyrillaceae. I. Development of male and female gametophytes inCliftonia monophylla (Lam.) Britton ex Sarg. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club96: 484–489.
—. 1970. Cyrillaceae.In: Symposium on comparative embryology of angiosperms. Bull. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad.41: 163–167.
-and U. Dhar.Kadsura heteroclita—microsporangium and pollen. J. Arnold Arbor.56: 176–181.
——. 1976.Scytopetalum tieghemii—embryologically unexplored taxon and affinities of the family Scytopetalaceae. Phytomorphology26: 10–22.
——. 1978. Embryology ofCyrilla andCliftonia (Cyrillaceae). Bot. Not.131: 127–138.
— andU. Malik. 1972. Morphology and embryology ofScaevola frutescens K. and affinities of the family Goodeniaceae. Bot. Not.125: 241–254.
— andU. Padmanaban. 1969. Morphology and embryology ofCentaurium ramosissimum Druce and affinities of the family Gentianaceae. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen46: 15–37.
— andG. S. Sarveshwari. 1968. Embryology and systematic position ofMarina longifolia Wall. Bot. Not.121: 383–402.
Vink, W. 1970. The Winteraceae of the Old World. I.Pseudowintera and Drimys—morphology and taxonomy. Blumea18: 225–354.
Vliet, G. J. C. M. van. 1976. Wood anatomy of the Rhizophoraceae. Leiden Bot. Series3: 20–75.
— andP. Baas. 1975. Comparative anatomy of Crypteroniaceae s.l. Blumea22: 173–195.
Wagenitz, G. 1959. Die systematische Stellung der Rubiaceae. Ein Beitrag zum System der Sympetalen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.79: 17–35.
—. 1975. Blütenreduktion als ein zentrales Problem der Angiospermen-Systematik. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.96: 448–470.
—. 1977. New aspects of the systematics of Asteridae. Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl.1: 375–395.
Wagner, P. 1977. Vessel types of the monocotyledons: a survey. Bot. Not.130: 383–402.
Wagner, W. H. 1969. The construction of classification. Systematic Biology, Publ. 1692 National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. pp. 67–90.
Walker, J. W. 1974a. Evolution of exine structure in the pollen of primitive angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot.61: 891–902.
—. 1974b. Aperture evolution in the pollen of primitive angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot.61: 1112–1137.
—. 1976a. Comparative pollen morphology and phylogeny of the Ranalean complex.In: C. B. Beck (ed.), Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. Columbia Univ. Press. New York. pp. 241–299.
-. 1976b. Evolutionary significance of the exine in the pollen of primitive angiosperms. I. K. Ferguson and J. Müller (eds.), The evolutionary significance of the exine. Linn. Soc. Symp. Series1: 251–308.
— andJ. A. Doyle. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: Palynology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 664–723.
— andJ. J. Skvarla. 1975. Primitively columellaless pollen: a new concept in the evolutionary morphology of angiosperms. Science187: 445–447.
Walters, J. L. 1962. Megasporogenesis and gametophyte selection inPaeonia californica. Amer. J. Bot.49: 787–792.
Walton, J. 1953. The evolution of the ovule in the pteridosperms. Adv. Sci.10: 223–230 (British Association Adv. Sci., No. 38).
Watson, L. 1967. Taxonomic implications of a comparative anatomical study of the Epacridaceae. New Phytol.66: 495–504.
—,W. T. Williams andG. N. Lance. 1967. A mixed-data approach to angiosperm taxonomy: the classification of Ericales. Proc. Linn. Soc. London178: 25–35.
Webster, G. L. 1967. The genera of Euphorbiaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor.48: 303–30.
—. 1975. Conspectus of a new classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Taxon24: 593–601.
Wernham, H. F. 1913. Floral evolution: with particular reference to the sympetalous dicotyledons. New Phytol.11: 373–397.
West, W. C. 1969. Ontogeny of oil cells in the woody Ranales. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club96: 329–344.
Westfall, J. J. 1949. Cytological and embryological evidence for the reclassification ofPaulownia. Amer. J. Bot.36: 805.
Wettstein, R. von. 1891–1893. Scrophulariaceae.In: A. Engler und K. Prantl, Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien IV, 3b: 39–107. Engelmann. Leipzig.
—. 1908. Handbuch der Systematischen Botanik. Franz Deuticke, Leipzig and Wien.
—. 1935. Handbuch der Systematischen Botanik, Vierte Aufl. Franz Deuticke. Leipzig and Wien.
Whipple, H. L. 1972. Structure and systematics ofPhryma leptostachya L. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.88: 1–17.
Whitaker, T. 1934. Chromosome constitution in some monocotyledons. J. Arnold Arbor.15: 135–143.
Whitehead, D. R. 1965. Pollen morphology in the Juglandaceae. 2. Survey of the family. J. Arnold Arbor.46: 369–410.
Wilkinson, A. M. 1949. Floral anatomy and morphology ofTriosteum and of the Caprifoliaceae in general. Amer. J. Bot.36: 481–489.
Williams, C. 1975. Biosystematics of the Monocotyledoneae—flavonoid patterns in leaves of the Liliaceae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol.3: 229–244.
Williams, N. H. 1975. Stomatal development inLudisia discolor (Orchidaceae): mesoperigenous subsidiary cells in the monocotyledons. Taxon24: 281–288.
—. 1979. Subsidiary cells in the Orchidaceae: their general distributions with special reference to development in the Oncidieae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.78: 41–66.
Wilson, C. L. 1976. Floral anatomy ofIdiospermum australiense (Idiospermaceae). Amer. J. Bot.63: 987–996.
Wilson, T. K. 1964. Comparative morphology of the Canellaceae. III. Pollen. Bot. Gaz.125: 192–197.
— andL. M. Maculans. 1965. The comparative morphology of the Canellaceae. II. Anatomy of the young stem and node. Amer. J. Bot.52: 369–378.
——. 1967. The morphology of the Myristicaceae. I. Flowers ofMyristica fragrans andM. malabarica. Amer. J. Bot.54: 214–220.
Wodehouse, R. P. 1935. Pollen grains. McGraw-Hill. New York.
—. 1936. Evolution of pollen grains. Bot. Rev.2: 67–89.
Wood, C. E. 1971. The Saururaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor.52: 479–485.
Wulff, H. D. 1939. Die Pollenentwicklung der Juncaceen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.87: 533–556.
Wunderlich, R. 1967. Some remarks on the taxonomic significance of the seed coat. Phytomorphology17: 301–311.
—. 1971. Die systematische Stellung vonTheligonum. Oesterr. Bot. Z.119: 329–394.
Yakovlev, M. S. 1950. The structure of endosperm and embryo in grasses. Trudy Bot. Inst. USSR Acad. Sci., ser. 7,1: 121–218. (In Russian).
— andM. D. Yoffe. 1957. On some peculiar features in the embryogeny ofPaeonia. Phytomorphology7: 74–82.
-and-. 1965. The embryology of the genusPaeonia. In: M. S. Yakovlev, ed., Flower morphology and reproductive processes of angiosperms. Leningrad, 140–176. (In Russian).
Yamazaki, T. 1966. The embryology ofShortia uniflora with a brief review of the systematic position of the Diapensiaceae. J. Jap. Bot.41: 245–251.
—. 1970, 1971. Embryological studies in Ebenales. J. Jap. Bot.45: 267–273; 353–358, 1970.46: 161–166, 1971.
Zazhurilo, K. K. 1940. On the anatomy of the seed coats of Magnoliaceae (Liriodendron tulipifera L.). Bull. Soc. Nat. Voronezh Univ. 4,1: 32–40. (In Russian).
— andE. K. Kuznetsova. 1939. The nature of diffuse placentation. Trudy Voronezh State Univ.10(5): 79–88. (In Russian).
Ziegenspeck, H. 1944. Das Vorkommen von Öl in den Stomata der Monokotyledonen und die Bedeutung des konstitutionalen Vorkommens für die Systematik derselben. Repert. Spec. Nov.53: 151–173.
Zimmermann, W. 1959. Die Phylogenie der Pflanzen. 2 Aufl. Fischer. Stuttgart.