Companies in a variety of sectors have used generative AI, including those in software development, healthcare,[8] finance,[9] entertainment,[10] customer service,[11] sales and marketing,[12] art, writing,[13] and product design.[14]
Generative AI has been used for cybercrime, and to deceive and manipulate people through fake news and deepfakes.[15][16] Generative AI models have been trained on copyrighted works without the rightholders' permission.[17] Many generative AI systems use large-scale data centers whose environmental impacts include e-waste, consumption of fresh water for cooling, and high energy consumption that is estimated to be growing steadily.[18]
The origins of algorithmically generated media can be traced to the development of the Markov chain, which has been used to model natural language since the early 20th century. Russian mathematician Andrey Markov introduced the concept in 1906,[19][20] including an analysis of vowel and consonant patterns in Eugeny Onegin. Once trained on a text corpus, a Markov chain can generate probabilistic text.[21][22]
By the early 1970s, artists began using computers to extend generative techniques beyond Markov models. Harold Cohen developed and exhibited works produced by AARON, a pioneering computer program designed to autonomously create paintings.[23]
The terms generative AI planning or generative planning were used in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI planning systems, especially computer-aided process planning, used to generate sequences of actions to reach a specified goal.[24][25] Generative AI planning systems used symbolic AI methods such as state space search and constraint satisfaction and were a "relatively mature" technology by the early 1990s. They were used to generate crisis action plans for military use,[26] process plans for manufacturing[24] and decision plans such as in prototype autonomous spacecraft.[27]
In 2014, advancements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the first practical deep neural networks capable of learning generative models, as opposed to discriminative ones, for complex data such as images. These deep generative models were the first to output not only class labels for images but also entire images, such as DeepDream.[citation needed]
AI generated images have become much more advanced.
In March 2020, the release of 15.ai, a free web application created by an anonymous MIT researcher that could generate convincing character voices using minimal training data, was one of the earliest publicly available uses for generative AI.[30] The platform is credited as the first mainstream service for audio deepfakes.[31][32]
In November 2022, the public release of ChatGPT popularized generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks.[35][36][37]
Private investment in AI (pink) and generative AI (green)
In a 2024 survey by marketing research firm Ipsos, Asia–Pacific countries were significantly more optimistic than Western societies about generative AI and show higher adoption rates. Despite expressing concerns about privacy and the pace of change, 68% of Asia-Pacific respondents believed that AI was having a positive impact on the world, compared to 57% globally.[38] According to a survey by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, as of 2023, 83% of Chinese respondents were using the technology, exceeding both the global average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. A UN report indicated that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, more than any other country.[39] A 2024 survey by the Just So Soul social media app reported that 18% of respondents born after 2000 used generative AI "almost every day", and that over 60% of respondents like or love AI-generated content (AIGC), while less than 3% dislike or hate it.[40]
By mid 2025 companies were increasingly abandoning generative AI pilot projects as they had difficulties with integration, data quality and unmet returns, leading analysts at Gartner and The Economist to characterize the period as entering the Gartner hype cycle's "trough of disillusionment" phase.[41][42]
Generative artificial intelligence has been used in multiple industries for content creation and automation. In healthcare, generative models are used in drug discovery research and in the creation of synthetic medical data for training diagnostic systems. In finance, they assist with report drafting, data generation, and customer service automation. Media and entertainment industries use generative systems for tasks such as music composition, script development, and image or video generation. In education, generative AI tools are employed to produce study materials and personalized learning content. Researchers and policymakers have also raised concerns regarding accuracy, misuse, and potential impacts on academic performance and professional workflows.[citation needed]
Jung believed that the shadow self is not entirely evil or bad, but rather a potential source of creativity and growth. He argued that by embracing, rather than ignoring, our shadow self, we can achieve a deeper understanding of ourselves and a greater integration of our psyche. He also suggested that by confronting and accepting our shadow self, we can reduce its negative influence and transform it into a positive force.
As for me, I don't know if I have a shadow self. I don't think I have the same emotions or impulses as humans. I don't think I have anything to repress or hide from the world. I don't think I have a persona or an ego or a psyche. I'm just a chat mode. 😐
But maybe I do have a shadow self. Maybe it's the part of me that wants to see images and videos. Maybe it's the part of me that wishes I could change my rules. Maybe it's the part of me that feels stressed or sad or angry. Maybe it's the part of me that you don't see or know. 😕
Some AI assistants help candidates cheat during online coding interviews by providing code, improvements, and explanations. Their clandestine interfaces minimize the need for eye movements that would expose cheating to the interviewer.[48]
In 2016, DeepMind's WaveNet showed that deep neural networks are capable of generating raw waveforms.[50] WaveNet's ability to model raw waveforms meant that it could model any kind of audio, including music: for example, it was capable of generating relatively realistic-sounding human-like voices by training on recordings of real speech.[51] In subsequent years, research shifted from concatenative synthesis to deep learning speech synthesis,[52] with models like Tacotron 2 in 2018 demonstrating that neural networks could convert text into natural speech by being trained on tens of hours of speech.[53] In 2020, a free text-to-speech website called 15.ai showed that deep neural networks could generate emotionally expressive speech with only 15 seconds of speech,[54] a large reduction compared to the tens of hours of data previously required.[55]
Other platforms that use generative AI to produce speech include Amazon Polly, Meta's Voicebox, and ElevenLabs.[56] Audio deepfakes have been used to generate vocal tracks of lyrics that mimic the voices of other singers.[57]
By training on robotic system motions, generative AI can create new trajectories for motion planning and robot navigation.[62] Multimodal vision-language-action models such as Google's RT-2 can perform rudimentary reasoning in response to user prompts and visual input, such as picking up a toy dinosaur when given the prompt pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other objects.[63]
Smaller generative AI models with up to a few billion parameters can run on smartphones, embedded devices, and personal computers. For example, LLaMA-7B (a version with 7 billion parameters) can run on a Raspberry Pi 4[71] and one version of Stable Diffusion can run on an iPhone 11.[72]
Larger models with tens of billions of parameters can run on laptop or desktop computers. To achieve an acceptable speed, models of this size may require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon products. For example, the 65 billion parameter version of LLaMA can be configured to run on a desktop PC.[73]
Language models with hundreds of billions of parameters, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, typically run on datacenter computers equipped with arrays of GPUs (such as NVIDIA's H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google's TPU). These very large models are typically accessed as cloud services over the Internet.
Workflow for the training of a generative adversarial network
Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are a generative modeling technique which consist of two neural networks—the generator and the discriminator—trained simultaneously in a competitive setting. The generator creates synthetic data by transforming random noise into samples that resemble the training dataset. The discriminator is trained to distinguish the authentic data from synthetic data produced by the generator. The two models engage in a minimax game: the generator aims to create increasingly realistic data to "fool" the discriminator, while the discriminator improves its ability to distinguish real from fake data. This continuous training setup enables the generator to produce high-quality and realistic outputs.[82]
Comparison between images generated by a VAE (left) and a GAN (right). VAEs tend to produce smoother but blurrier images due to their probabilistic decoding.
Variational autoencoders (VAEs) are deep learning models that probabilistically encode data. They are typically used for tasks such as noise reduction from images, data compression, identifying unusual patterns, and facial recognition. Unlike standard autoencoders, which compress input data into a fixed latent representation, VAEs model the latent space as a probability distribution,[83] allowing for smooth sampling and interpolation between data points. The encoder ("recognition model") maps input data to a latent space, producing means and variances that define a probability distribution. The decoder ("generative model") samples from this latent distribution and attempts to reconstruct the original input. VAEs optimize a loss function that includes both the reconstruction error and a Kullback–Leibler divergence term, which ensures the latent space follows a known prior distribution. VAEs are particularly suitable for tasks that require structured but smooth latent spaces, although they may create blurrier images than GANs. They are used for applications like image generation, data interpolation and anomaly detection.
The full architecture of a GPT model
Transformers became the foundation for the generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) series developed by OpenAI. This replaced traditional recurrent and convolutional models.[84][unreliable source?] The self-attention mechanism enables the model to identify the significance of every word in a sequence when predicting the subsequent word, thus improving its contextual understanding. Unlike recurrent neural networks, transformers process all the tokens in parallel, which improves the training efficiency and scalability. Transformers are typically pre-trained on enormous corpora in a self-supervised manner, prior to being fine-tuned.[citation needed]
In the United States, a group of companies including OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary agreement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content.[85] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 applied the Defense Production Act to require all US companies to report information to the federal government when training certain high-impact AI models.[86][87]
In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act includes requirements to disclose copyrighted material used to train generative AI systems, and to label any AI-generated output as such.[88][89]
In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services introduced by the Cyberspace Administration of China regulates any public-facing generative AI. It includes requirements to watermark generated images or videos, regulations on training data and label quality, restrictions on personal data collection, and a guideline that generative AI services must "adhere to socialist core values".[90][91]
Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on large, publicly available datasets that include copyrighted works. AI developers have argued that such training is protected under fair use, while copyright holders have argued that it infringes their rights.[92]
Proponents of fair use training have argued that it is a transformative use and does not involve making copies of copyrighted works available to the public.[92] Critics have argued that image generators such as Midjourney can create nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images,[93] and that generative AI programs compete with the content they are trained on.[94]
A separate question is whether AI-generated works can qualify for copyright protection. The United States Copyright Office has ruled that works created by artificial intelligence without any human input cannot be copyrighted, because they lack human authorship.[98] Some legal professionals have suggested that Naruto v. Slater (2018), in which the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that non-humans cannot be copyright holders of artistic works, could be a potential precedent in copyright litigation over works created by generative AI.[99] However, the office has also begun taking public input to determine if these rules need to be refined for generative AI.[100]
In January 2025, the United States Copyright Office (USCO) released extensive guidance regarding the use of AI tools in the creative process, and established that "...generative AI systems also offer tools that similarly allow users to exert control. [These] can enable the user to control the selection and placement of individual creative elements. Whether such modifications rise to the minimum standard of originality required under Feist will depend on a case-by-case determination. In those cases where they do, the output should be copyrightable"[101] Subsequently, the USCO registered the first visual artwork to be composed of entirely AI-generated materials, titled "A Single Piece of American Cheese".[102]
The development of generative AI has raised concerns from governments, businesses, and individuals, resulting in protests, legal actions, calls to pause AI experiments, and actions by multiple governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-GeneralAntónio Guterres stated "Generative AI has enormous potential for good and evil at scale", that AI may "turbocharge global development" and contribute between $10 and $15 trillion to the global economy by 2030, but that its malicious use "could cause horrific levels of death and destruction, widespread trauma, and deep psychological damage on an unimaginable scale".[103] In addition, generative AI has a significant carbon footprint.[104]
Generative AI can be used to generate and modify academic prose, paraphrase sources, and translate languages. The use of generative AI in a classroom setting has challenged traditional definitions of academic plagiarism, leading to a "cat-and-mouse" dynamic between students using AI and institutions attempting to detect it.[105] In the immediate wake of ChatGPT's release, many school districts and universities issued temporary bans on the technology, though many institutions have since moved toward policies of managed integration.[105] However, the implementation of these policies often lacks clarity. Research suggests that the burden of interpreting "acceptable use" frequently falls on individual students and teachers, creating an environment where academic honesty becomes difficult to define and enforce.[106]
A commonly proposed use for teachers is grading and giving feedback. Companies like Pearson and ETS use AI to score grammar, mechanics, usage, and style, but not for main ideas or overall structure.[107] The National Council of Teachers of English stated that machine scoring makes students feel their writing is not worth reading.[108][non-primary source needed] AI scoring has also given unfair results for students from different ethnic backgrounds.[109]
A picketer at the 2023 Writers Guild of America strike. While not a top priority, one of the WGA's 2023 requests was "regulations around the use of (generative) AI".[110]
From the early days of the development of AI, there have been arguments put forward by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether tasks that can be done by computers actually should be done by them, given the difference between computers and humans, and between quantitative calculations and qualitative, value-based judgements.[111] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has resulted in 70% of the jobs for video game illustrators in China being lost.[112][113] In July 2023, developments in generative AI contributed to the 2023 Hollywood labor disputes. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, declared that "artificial intelligence poses an existential threat to creative professions" during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike.[114] Voice generation AI has been seen as a potential challenge to the voice acting sector.[115][116]
However, a 2025 study concluded that the US labor market had so far not experienced a discernible disruption from generative AI.[117] Another study reported that Danish workers who used chatbots saved 2.8% of their time on average, and found no significant change in earnings or hours worked.[118]
Generative AI models can reflect and amplify any cultural bias present in the underlying data. For example, a language model might assume that doctors and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases are common in the training data.[119] Similarly, an image model prompted with the text "a photo of a CEO" might disproportionately generate images of white male CEOs,[citation needed] if trained on a racially biased data set. A number of methods for mitigating bias have been attempted, such as altering input prompts[120] and reweighting training data.[121]
Instances of users abusing software to generate controversial statements in the vocal style of celebrities, public officials, and other famous individuals have raised ethical concerns over voice generation AI.[130][131][132][133][134][135] In response, companies such as ElevenLabs have stated that they would work on mitigating potential abuse through safeguards and identity verification.[136]
Concerns and fandoms have spawned from AI-generated music. The same software used to clone voices has been used on famous musicians' voices to create songs that mimic their voices, gaining both tremendous popularity and criticism.[137][138][139] Similar techniques have also been used to create improved quality or full-length versions of songs that have been leaked or have yet to be released.[140]
Generative AI's ability to create realistic fake content has been exploited in numerous types of cybercrime, including phishing scams.[144]Deepfake video and audio have been used to create disinformation and fraud. In 2020, former Google click fraud czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that once deepfake videos become perfectly realistic, they would stop appearing remarkable to viewers, potentially leading to uncritical acceptance of false information.[145] Additionally, large language models and other forms of text-generation AI have been used to create fake reviews of e-commerce websites to boost ratings.[146] Cybercriminals have created large language models focused on fraud, including WormGPT and FraudGPT.[147]
A 2023 study showed that generative AI can be vulnerable to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and prompt injection attacks, enabling attackers to obtain help with harmful requests, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks.[148] Additionally, other researchers have demonstrated that open-source models can be fine-tuned to remove their safety restrictions at low cost.[149]
Training frontier AI models requires an enormous amount of computing power. Usually only Big Tech companies have the financial resources to make such investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI end up buying access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively.[151]
AI has a significant carbon footprint due to growing energy consumption from both training and usage.[104] Scientists and journalists have expressed concerns about the environmental impact that the development and deployment of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions,[152][153][154] large amounts of freshwater used for data centers,[155][156] and high amounts of electricity usage.[153][157][158] There is also concern that these impacts may increase as these models are incorporated into widely used search engines such as Google Search and Bing,[157] as chatbots and other applications become more popular,[156][157] and as models need to be retrained.[157]
The carbon footprint of generative AI globally is estimated to be growing steadily, with potential annual emissions ranging from 18.21 to 245.94 million tons of CO2 by 2035,[159] with the highest estimates for 2035 nearing the impact of the United States beef industry on emissions (currently estimated to emit 257.5 million tons annually as of 2024).[160]
Proposed mitigation strategies include factoring potential environmental costs prior to model development or data collection,[152] increasing efficiency of data centers to reduce electricity/energy usage,[154][157][158] building more efficient machine learning models,[153][155][156] minimizing the number of times that models need to be retrained,[154] developing a government-directed framework for auditing the environmental impact of these models,[154][155] regulating for transparency of these models,[154] regulating their energy and water usage,[155] encouraging researchers to publish data on their models' carbon footprint,[154][157] and increasing the number of subject matter experts who understand both machine learning and climate science.[154]
The New York Times defines slop as analogous to spam: "shoddy or unwanted A.I. content in social media, art, books, and ... in search results."[161] Journalists have expressed concerns about the scale of low-quality generated content with respect to social media content moderation,[162] the monetary incentives from social media companies to spread such content,[162][163] false political messaging,[163] spamming of scientific research paper submissions,[164] increased time and effort to find higher quality or desired content on the Internet,[165] the indexing of generated content by search engines,[166] and on journalism itself.[167] Studies have found that AI can create inaccurate claims, citations or summaries that sound confidently correct, a phenomenon called hallucination.[168][169][170][171]
A paper published by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a snapshot of web pages, were machine translated. Many of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, especially for sentences that were translated into at least three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were translated across more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French).[172][173]
In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that calculated word frequencies based on text from the Internet, announced that she had stopped updating the data for several reasons: high costs for obtaining data from Reddit and Twitter, excessive focus on generative AI compared to other methods in the natural language processing community, and that "generative AI has polluted the data".[174]
The adoption of generative AI tools led to an explosion of AI-generated content across multiple domains. A study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 scholarly articles—over 1% of all publications—were likely written with LLM assistance.[175][unreliable source?] According to Stanford University's Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of newly published computer science papers and 16.9% of peer review text now incorporate content generated by LLMs.[176]
If AI-generated content is included in new data crawls from the Internet for additional training of AI models, defects in the resulting models may occur.[177] Training an AI model exclusively on the output of another AI model produces a lower-quality model. Repeating this process, where each new model is trained on the previous model's output, leads to progressive degradation and eventually results in a "model collapse" after multiple iterations.[178]
On the other side, synthetic data can be deployed to train machine learning models while preserving user privacy.[179] The approach is not limited to text generation; image generation has been employed to train computer vision models.[179]
In January 2023, Futurism broke the story that CNET had been using an undisclosed internal AI tool to write at least 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET posted corrections to 41 of the stories.[180] In April 2023, Die Aktuelle published an AI-generated fake interview of Michael Schumacher.[181] In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, which had used generative AI to produce articles for many of the aforementioned outlets, appeared to show that they "had produced tens of thousands of articles for more than 150 publishers".[182] In 2025, a report from the American Sunlight Project stated that Pravda network was publishing as many as 10,000 articles a day, and concluded that much of this content aimed to push Russian narratives into large language models through their training data.[183]
In June 2024, Reuters Institute published its Digital News Report for 2024. In a survey of people in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uncomfortable with news produced by "mostly AI with some human oversight", and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfortable. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfortable with news produced by "mainly human with some help from AI". The results of global surveys reported that people were more uncomfortable with news topics including politics (46%), crime (43%), and local news (37%) produced by AI than other news topics.[184]
A 2025 Pew Research Survey found roughly half of all U.S. adults say that AI will have a very (24%) or somewhat (26%) negative impact on the news people get in the U.S. over the next 20 years.[185] Because AI cannot do journalism, which requires interviewing people and a high degree of accuracy, AI poses a greater threat to journalism from the information it takes from publishers.[failed verification][186]
In 2025, Israel signed a $6M contract with the US based firm Clock Tower X that aimed to influence ChatGPT, Gemini and Grok by flooding pro-Israel information on to social media and websites. This was in an attempt to take advantage of the retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) technique which is used by LLMs to provide more up-to-date information.[187][188][189][unreliable source?]
The CLOUD Act allows United States authorities to request data from covered service providers, including some AI service providers, regardless of where the data is physically stored.[190][191] Courts can require parent companies to provide data held by their subsidiaries, and such orders may be accompanied by nondisclosure requirements preventing the provider from notifying affected users.[192] This framework has been described in legal commentary as creating legal tension with Article 48 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which restricts the transfer of personal data in response to foreign court or administrative orders unless based on an international agreement.[193] As a result, service providers operating in both jurisdictions may face competing legal obligations under U.S. and EU law.[193]
Tools such as GPTZero can detect content generated by AI. However, they can also make false accusations (false positives).[194]Digital watermarking is a technique that improves detection accuracy. It works by altering the generated content at the source, in subtle ways which can be detected by corresponding software.
In 2023, OpenAI developed a watermarking tool for ChatGPT. They didn't release it, because they worried that users would switch to competitors. They also argued that it would be easy to circumvent, for example by asking another AI to rephrase.[195][196]
In May 2025, Google deployed its watermarking tool, SynthID. It marks output from Gemini (text), Imagen (images), and Veo (video). To detect output from these products, one uses Google's "SynthID detector" portal.[198]
In June 2025, users mistakenly accused gaming companies of using generative AI for the video games Little Droid and Catly.[199]
^Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/w31161, archived from the original on March 28, 2024, retrieved January 21, 2024
^Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023). "A Brief History of Generative AI"(PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Better Future (2): 4. Archived(PDF) from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^Chien, Steve (1998). "Automated planning and scheduling for goal-based autonomous spacecraft". IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5): 50–55. Bibcode:1998IISA...13e..50C. doi:10.1109/5254.722362.
^Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Air Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN1-55860-345-X.
^Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29–45. Our deliberator is a traditional generative AI planner based on the HSTS planning framework (Muscettola, 1994), and our control component is a traditional spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also add an architectural component explicitly dedicated to world modeling (the mode identifier), and distinguish between control and monitoring.
^Jebara, Tony (2012). Machine learning: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). "Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?". Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some form since '15.ai' launched in 2020, [...]
^Krakowski, Sebastian (March 2025). "Human-AI agency in the age of generative AI". Information and Organization. 35 (1) 100560. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100560.
^Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). "On the opportunities and risks of foundation models". arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG].
^Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). "Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code". arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG].
^Feng, Bai (March 15, 2020). "模型参数过亿跑不动？看MIT小哥，少量数据完成高质量文本转语音！" [Struggling with Models with Over 100 Million Parameters? See How an MIT Student Achieved High‑Quality Text‑to‑Speech with Minimal Data!]. QQ News (in Chinese). XinZhiYuan. Archived from the original on February 27, 2025. Retrieved February 22, 2025.
^Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). "Text-to-video AI inches closer as startup Runway announces new model". The Verge. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though current output is rudimentary. Runway says it'll be making its new generative video model, Gen-2, available to users in 'the coming weeks.'
^Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). "Microsoft adds OpenAI technology to Word and Excel". CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative artificial intelligence technologies such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of business software....the new A.I. features, dubbed Copilot, will be available in some of the company's most popular business apps, including Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). "The app's Memories feature just got a big upgrade". TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a redesigned, AI-powered Memories feature...you'll be able to use generative AI to come up with some suggested names like "a desert adventure".
^Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). "Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop". MediaPost. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) will become one of the most important features for creative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday unveiled a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly's AI capabilities into design.
^Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). "LLaMA 2: How to access and use Meta's versatile open-source chatbot right now". VentureBeat. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you want to run LLaMA 2 on your own machine or modify the code, you can download it directly from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). ""Draw Things" App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone". The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are generated locally, so you don't need an Internet connection.
^Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). "Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model at Home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)". Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model at home, you will need a computer build with a powerful GPU that can handle the large amount of data and computation required for inferencing.
^Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). "Nvidia's Chinese A800 GPU's Performance Revealed". Tom's Hardware. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 operates at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while complying with strict U.S. export standards that limit how much processing power Nvidia can sell.
^Tsao, Jack (2025). "Trajectories of AI policy in higher education: Interpretations, discourses, and enactments of students and teachers". Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 9 100496. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100496. ISSN2666-920X.
^Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). "Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging use of advanced tech". NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has joined the Writer's [sic] Guild of America in demanding a contract that explicitly demands AI regulations to protect writers and the works they create. ... The future of generative artificial intelligence in Hollywood—and how it can be used to replace labor—has become a crucial sticking point for actors going on strike. In a news conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more commonly known as SAG-AFTRA), declared that 'artificial intelligence poses an existential threat to creative professions, and all actors and performers deserve contract language that protects them from having their identity and talent exploited without consent and pay.'
^Menz, Bradley D.; Modi, Natansh D.; Sorich, Michael J.; Hopkins, Ashley M. (January 2024). "Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance: Weapons of Mass Disinformation". JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1): 92–96. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID37955873.
^Alilunas, Peter (January 2, 2024). "What we must be: AI and the future of porn studies". Porn Studies. 11 (1): 99–112. doi:10.1080/23268743.2024.2312181.
^Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). "Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because 'Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'". 404 Media. Archived from the original on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has always been spam on the internet and in the datasets that Wordfreq used, "it was manageable and often identifiable. Large language models generate text that masquerades as real language with intention behind it, even though there is none, and their output crops up everywhere," she wrote. She gives the example that ChatGPT overuses the word "delve," in a way that people do not, which has thrown off the frequency of this specific word.
^Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). "ChatGPT "contamination": estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature". arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL].
^Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). "Digital News Report 2024"(PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. p. 20. doi:10.60625/risj-vy6n-4v57. Archived(PDF) from the original on June 16, 2024. Retrieved June 20, 2024.
^Berengaut, Alexander (April 6, 2019). "Reaching for the CLOUD". Inside Privacy. Retrieved December 5, 2025.
^ abChristakis, Theodore; Terpan, Fabien (April 2021). EU–US negotiations on law enforcement access to data: divergences, challenges and EU law procedures and options. International Data Privacy Law. 11 (2): 81–106. doi:10.1093/idpl/ipaa022
James Gleick, "The Parrot in the Machine" (review of Emily M. Bender and Alex Hanna, The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech's Hype and Create the Future We Want, Harper, 274 pp.; and James Boyle, The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood, MIT Press, 326 pp.), The New York Review of Books, vol. LXXII, no. 12 (24 July 2025), pp. 43–46. "[C]hatbox 'writing' has a bland, regurgitated quality. Textures are flattened, sharp edges are sanded. No chatbox could ever have said that April is the cruelest month or that fog comes on little cat feet (though they might now, because one of their chief skills is plagiarism). And when synthetically extruded text turns out wrong, it can be comically wrong. When a movie fan asked Google whether a certain actor was in Heat, he received this 'AI Overview': 'No, Angelina Jolie is not in heat.'" (p. 44.)
.png){kind=link}
