Under some conditions the earlier fix for bpo-18075, "Infinite recursion tests triggering a segfault on Mac OS X", now causes failures on macOS when attempting to change stack limit with resource.setrlimit resource.RLIMIT_STACK, like regrtest does when running the test suite. The reverted change had specified a non-default stack size when linking the python executable on macOS. As of macOS 10.14.4, the previous code causes a hard failure when running tests, although similar failures had been seen under some conditions under some earlier systems. For now, revert the original change and resume using the default stack size when linking the interpreter.
ned-deily deleted the bpo-34602-macos-stacksize branch
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request
…H-13011) Under some conditions the earlier fix for bpo-18075, "Infinite recursion tests triggering a segfault on Mac OS X", now causes failures on macOS when attempting to change stack limit with resource.setrlimit resource.RLIMIT_STACK, like regrtest does when running the test suite. The reverted change had specified a non-default stack size when linking the python executable on macOS. As of macOS 10.14.4, the previous code causes a hard failure when running tests, although similar failures had been seen under some conditions under some earlier systems. For now, revert the original change and resume using the default stack size when linking the interpreter. (cherry picked from commit 883dfc6) Co-authored-by: Ned Deily <nad@python.org>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request
Under some conditions the earlier fix for bpo-18075, "Infinite recursion tests triggering a segfault on Mac OS X", now causes failures on macOS when attempting to change stack limit with resource.setrlimit resource.RLIMIT_STACK, like regrtest does when running the test suite. The reverted change had specified a non-default stack size when linking the python executable on macOS. As of macOS 10.14.4, the previous code causes a hard failure when running tests, although similar failures had been seen under some conditions under some earlier systems. For now, revert the original change and resume using the default stack size when linking the interpreter. (cherry picked from commit 883dfc6) Co-authored-by: Ned Deily <nad@python.org>
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request
…H-13011) Under some conditions the earlier fix for bpo-18075, "Infinite recursion tests triggering a segfault on Mac OS X", now causes failures on macOS when attempting to change stack limit with resource.setrlimit resource.RLIMIT_STACK, like regrtest does when running the test suite. The reverted change had specified a non-default stack size when linking the python executable on macOS. As of macOS 10.14.4, the previous code causes a hard failure when running tests, although similar failures had been seen under some conditions under some earlier systems. For now, revert the original change and resume using the default stack size when linking the interpreter. (cherry picked from commit 883dfc6) Co-authored-by: Ned Deily <nad@python.org>
ned-deily added a commit that referenced this pull request
… (GH-13014) Under some conditions the earlier fix for bpo-18075, "Infinite recursion tests triggering a segfault on Mac OS X", now causes failures on macOS when attempting to change stack limit with resource.setrlimit resource.RLIMIT_STACK, like regrtest does when running the test suite. The reverted change had specified a non-default stack size when linking the python executable on macOS. As of macOS 10.14.4, the previous code causes a hard failure when running tests, although similar failures had been seen under some conditions under some earlier systems. For now, revert the original change and resume using the default stack size when linking the interpreter. (cherry picked from commit 883dfc6) Co-authored-by: Ned Deily <nad@python.org>
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters