|
Looks like there's an incorrect reference to issue 32248 in the description. |
|
Whoops, you're right. Not sure how I did that. 32102 is the correct issue number. I've fixed the description and reference. However, my branch name is still incorrect. Does that matter? If so I can close this PR and open a new one with a better branch name. |
|
The branch name doesn't technically matter, so that's entirely up to you. Thanks for fixing things. |
this keeps the old description of *text* and makes the *capture_output* mention its own sentence.
This PR adds the
capture_outputparameter tosubprocess.run, as described in issue 32102.I have been pleased to see the
subprocessgetting easier to use over the last few releases, and was happy to see the idea for replacingsubprocess.run(..., stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)with something friendlier had already been proposed.https://bugs.python.org/issue32102