[proxy] web.archive.org← back | site home | direct (HTTPS) ↗ | proxy home | ◑ dark◐ light

Newspaper sales dip, but websites gain

By David Lieberman, USA TODAY

 BIGGEST NEWSPAPERS
Avg. paid weekday circulation of the 20 largest newspapers, 6 mos. ended March 31; change from a year ago.
1. USA TODAY

2,272,815

up

0.09%

2. Wall Street Journal

2,049,786

down

1.00%

3. New York Times

1,142,464

up

0.50%

4. Los Angeles Times

851,832

down

5.40%

5. Washington Post

724,242

down

3.70%

6. New York Daily News

708,477

down

3.70%

7. New York Post

673,379

down

0.70%

8. Chicago Tribune

579,079

up

0.90%

9. Houston Chronicle

513,387

down

3.60%

10. Arizona Republic

438,722

down

2.10%

11. Newsday (Long Island)

427,771

down

2.70%

12. The Star-Ledger (N.J.)

398,329

up

0.90%

13. San Francisco Chronicle

398,246

down

15.60%

14. Boston Globe

397,288

down

8.50%

15. Atlanta Journal-Constitution

365,011

down

6.70%

16. Star Tribune (Minn.-St. Paul)

362,964

down

2.90%

17. Philadelphia Inquirer

350,457

down

5.10%

18. Detroit Free Press

345,861

up

0.04%

19. (Cleveland) Plain Dealer

343,163

down

1.60%

20. St. Petersburg (Fla.) Times

323,031

down

4.40%

Source: Audit Bureau of Circulations
The Dallas Morning News and the Chicago Sun-Times deferred filing for the period.

Newspaper sales dip, but websites gain

NEW YORK — Newspapers offered a mixed story Monday as new data showed a circulation decline industrywide — by alarming rates at some papers — while visits to their websites grew.

Average weekday circulation fell 2.5%, to 45.4 million, in the six months ending March 31, vs. the same period last year, according to a Newspaper Association of America (NAA) analysis of Audit Bureau of Circulations data from 770 dailies. Sunday circulation fell 3.1% to 48.5 million at 610 reporting newspapers.

The numbers reflect a continuation of a trend that began in the 1980s, as younger people turn to cable TV and the Internet to learn about current events. "It used to be a truism that the only thing a newspaper had to do to improve circulation is produce a better newspaper," says industry analyst John Morton. "Now, young people aren't any more inclined to pick up a good newspaper than a bad one. That isn't likely to change."

Still, results among top newspapers were varied.

USA TODAY's sales grew 0.1% to 2.27 million, even with a newsstand price increase to 75 cents in September 2004. The New York Times also was up 0.5% to 1.14 million, while the Chicago Tribune rose 0.9% to 579,079. The Wall Street Journal fell 1% to 2.05 million.

Industry circulation figures were skewed by steep losses in a few big cities, including The San Francisco Chronicle's 15.6% drop. The Boston Globe fell 8.5%, and The Boston Herald lost 9.1%. The Los Angeles Times fell 5.4%, and the Los Angeles Daily News dropped 11.9%.

"Those markets have fallen off a cliff," says Benchmark Co. analyst Edward Atorino. "If you look beyond them, you have to wonder, maybe the worst is over for the core group" of newspapers.

Investors seemed unfazed by the circulation declines. Tribune Co. shares were up 6.5% to $29.84. New York Times Co. (NYT) rose 4.6% to $25.70. McClatchy (MNI) appreciated 3.2% to $47.09. And Gannett (GCI), which owns USA TODAY, closed 2.9% higher at $56.86.

While analysts see circulation as a key benchmark for newspaper performance, the NAA, an industry trade group, urged industry watchers to also look at gains in the number of visits to newspaper websites.

It cited Nielsen/NetRatings data showing that an average of 56 million Web users visited a newspaper site in each of the first three months of 2006, up 8% from the same period in 2005.

The NAA also pointed to a study it commissioned from Scarborough Research that showed that the top 50 newspapers, with combined circulation of 21 million, attracted more than 58 million readers in print or online on a typical weekday in November. "You don't have the whole story about a newspaper's reach without the (study)," NAA chief John Strum says.

Atorino says the NAA has a ways to go to persuade advertisers to accept the new standard for a newspaper's reach. "It's not a bogus argument, but it's all in the eye of the beholder," he says. The newspapers started late (in promoting readership instead of circulation) and have done a mediocre job in selling it."

Posted 5/8/2006 11:07 AM ET
Updated 5/9/2006 2:12 PM ET E-mail | Print |