[proxy] web.archive.org — ← back | site home | direct (HTTPS) ↗ | proxy home | ◑ dark◐ light

/ cpython Public

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[3.6] bpo-34770: Fix a possible null pointer dereference in pyshellext.cpp (GH-9497) #9556

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 25, 2018
Merged

[3.6] bpo-34770: Fix a possible null pointer dereference in pyshellext.cpp (GH-9497) #9556

merged 1 commit into from Sep 25, 2018

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

miss-islington commented Sep 25, 2018 •
edited by bedevere-bot

The GlobalLock() call in UpdateDropDescription() was not checked for
failure.

https://bugs.python.org/issue34770
(cherry picked from commit f6c8007)

Co-authored-by: Zackery Spytz zspytz@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue34770

bpo-34770: Fix a possible null pointer dereference in pyshellext.cpp (p…
8c46bd7 
…ythonGH-9497)

The GlobalLock() call in UpdateDropDescription() was not checked for
failure.

https://bugs.python.org/issue34770
(cherry picked from commit f6c8007)

Co-authored-by: Zackery Spytz <zspytz@gmail.com>
bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2018
Merged
Copy link
Author

miss-islington commented Sep 25, 2018

@ZackerySpytz: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

miss-islington merged commit 936d740 into python:3.6 Sep 25, 2018
6 checks passed
miss-islington deleted the backport-f6c8007-3.6 branch Sep 25, 2018
Copy link
Author

miss-islington commented Sep 25, 2018

@ZackerySpytz: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

zhangyangyu

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
CLA signed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants