Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
621bfd3
to
97dd426
Compare
|
Yes, we should bump the magic number, as otherwise cached pyc files will still exhibit the bug - we need the interpreter to clear them out and recompile them. |
|
I'm not sure this is needed. The version with the bug was not released. The bug affects only pre-alpha testers. AFAIK there are no precedences of bumping the magic number at pre-alpha stage for fixing a bug. |
|
Fair point, especially as the new test case is the only example of the problem in the code base. We can probably skip the NEWS entry for the same reason (i.e. it fixes a bug in never-released code, so the fact the bug existed isn't exactly relevant to most users) |
…hon#3217) binding a submodule to a name.
…dule to a name.
https://bugs.python.org/issue30024