[proxy] web.archive.org — ← back | site home | direct (HTTPS) ↗ | proxy home | ◑ dark◐ light
/ cpython Public

[3.9] bpo-40663: Correctly handle annotations with subscripts in ast_unparse.c (GH-20156) #20324

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[3.9] bpo-40663: Correctly handle annotations with subscripts in ast_unparse.c (GH-20156) #20324

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

miss-islington commented May 22, 2020 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

(cherry picked from commit 2135e10)

Co-authored-by: Batuhan Taskaya batuhanosmantaskaya@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue40663

bpo-40663: Correctly handle annotations with subscripts in ast_unpars…
7a13f80 
…e.c (pythonGH-20156)

(cherry picked from commit 2135e10)

Co-authored-by: Batuhan Taskaya <batuhanosmantaskaya@gmail.com>
bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request May 22, 2020
Merged
Copy link
Member

isidentical commented May 22, 2020

IIRC this PR was actually got in the 3.9, no?

Copy link
Member

isidentical commented May 22, 2020

2135e10 [tagged as 3.9 beta]

pablogsal closed this May 22, 2020
miss-islington deleted the backport-2135e10-3.9 branch May 22, 2020 22:35
Copy link
Member

pablogsal commented May 22, 2020

2135e10 [tagged as 3.9 beta]

Yeah, seeing that the diff was not null confused me :S

Copy link
Contributor Author

miss-islington commented May 22, 2020

@isidentical and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

pablogsal pablogsal approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

awaiting merge

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants