Issue 21527: concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor does not use a default value

Side-by-side diffs	Delta from patch set	Stats	Patch
Doc/library/concurrent.futures.rst	View	1	1 chunk	+9 lines, -1 line	0 comments	Download
Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py	View	1	2 chunks	+6 lines, -1 line	0 comments	Download
Lib/test/test_concurrent_futures.py	View	1	2 chunks	+6 lines, -0 lines	0 comments	Download

gvanrossum

http://bugs.python.org/review/21527/diff/11902/Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py File Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py (right): http://bugs.python.org/review/21527/diff/11902/Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py#newcode92 Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py:92: max_workers = os.cpu_count() or 1 I don't think this ...

5 years, 2 months ago #1

Claudiu.Popa

http://bugs.python.org/review/21527/diff/11902/Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py File Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py (right): http://bugs.python.org/review/21527/diff/11902/Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py#newcode92 Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py:92: max_workers = os.cpu_count() or 1 On 2014/08/27 16:21:23, gvanrossum ...

5 years, 2 months ago #2

bquinlan

http://bugs.python.org/review/21527/diff/11902/Doc/library/concurrent.futures.rst File Doc/library/concurrent.futures.rst (right): http://bugs.python.org/review/21527/diff/11902/Doc/library/concurrent.futures.rst#newcode125 Doc/library/concurrent.futures.rst:125: not given, it will default to the number of ...

5 years, 2 months ago #3

Claudiu.Popa

5 years, 2 months ago #4

http://bugs.python.org/review/21527/diff/11902/Doc/library/concurrent.futures...
File Doc/library/concurrent.futures.rst (right):

http://bugs.python.org/review/21527/diff/11902/Doc/library/concurrent.futures...
Doc/library/concurrent.futures.rst:125: not given, it will default to the number
of processors on the machine.
On 2014/08/28 22:14:09, bquinlan wrote:
> This isn't true anymore.

Yes, I've changed it in the second patch set.

Sign in to reply to this message.

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 #

Messages