Issue40273
Created on 2020-04-13 13:54 by jack1142, last changed 2020-05-21 15:20 by rhettinger. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 19513 | merged | ZackerySpytz, 2020-04-14 15:56 | |
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg366315 - (view) | Author: (jack1142) * | Date: 2020-04-13 13:54 | |
Starting in version 3.8, dicts are reversible so it would make sense if mapping proxy were also reversible. Especially that `reversed(proxied_dict.keys())` does work. |
|||
| msg366321 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * | Date: 2020-04-13 18:14 | |
This seems reasonable. +1 |
|||
| msg368421 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * | Date: 2020-05-08 05:25 | |
New changeset 02fa0ea9c1073e4476c9bde3d7112f5dd964aa57 by Zackery Spytz in branch 'master': bpo-40273: Reversible mappingproxy (FH-19513) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/02fa0ea9c1073e4476c9bde3d7112f5dd964aa57 |
|||
| msg369522 - (view) | Author: Rémi Lapeyre (remi.lapeyre) * | Date: 2020-05-21 13:32 | |
I think this issue can be closed thanks to Zackery Spytz. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-05-21 15:20:07 | rhettinger | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2020-05-21 13:32:41 | remi.lapeyre | set | nosy:
+ remi.lapeyre messages: + msg369522 |
| 2020-05-08 05:25:57 | rhettinger | set | messages: + msg368421 |
| 2020-04-14 15:56:54 | ZackerySpytz | set | keywords:
+ patch nosy: + ZackerySpytz pull_requests:
+ pull_request18866 |
| 2020-04-13 18:14:01 | rhettinger | set | keywords:
+ easy (C) messages:
+ msg366321 |
| 2020-04-13 14:39:42 | xtreak | set | nosy:
+ rhettinger |
| 2020-04-13 13:57:05 | jack1142 | set | type: enhancement |
| 2020-04-13 13:54:42 | jack1142 | create | |