[proxy] web.archive.org — ← back | site home | direct (HTTPS) ↗ | proxy home | ◑ dark◐ light
/ cpython Public
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[3.6] bpo-35351: Pass link time optimization flags to CFLAGS_NODIST (GH-10797) #11046

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2018
Merged

[3.6] bpo-35351: Pass link time optimization flags to CFLAGS_NODIST (GH-10797) #11046

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2018

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

miss-islington commented Dec 9, 2018 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

When using link time optimizations, the -flto flag is passed to
BASECFLAGS, which makes it propagate to distutils. Those flags
should be reserved for the interpreter and the stdlib extension
modules only, thus moving those flags to CFLAGS_NODIST.
(cherry picked from commit f92c7aa)

Co-authored-by: stratakis cstratak@redhat.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue35351

bpo-35351: Pass link time optimization flags to CFLAGS_NODIST (python…
1375a87 
…GH-10797)

When using link time optimizations, the -flto flag is passed to
BASECFLAGS, which makes it propagate to distutils. Those flags
should be reserved for the interpreter and the stdlib extension
modules only, thus moving those flags to CFLAGS_NODIST.
(cherry picked from commit f92c7aa)

Co-authored-by: stratakis <cstratak@redhat.com>
bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2018
Merged
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stratakis and @vstinner: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

miss-islington merged commit f2d2cb1 into python:3.6 Dec 9, 2018
miss-islington deleted the backport-f92c7aa-3.6 branch December 9, 2018 08:35
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stratakis and @vstinner: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

ned-deily ned-deily approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants