[proxy] web.archive.org — ← back | site home | direct (HTTPS) ↗ | proxy home | ◑ dark◐ light
/ cpython Public

[3.8] bpo-38191: Accept arbitrary keyword names in NamedTuple() and TypedDict(). (GH-16222) #16237

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2019
Merged

[3.8] bpo-38191: Accept arbitrary keyword names in NamedTuple() and TypedDict(). (GH-16222) #16237

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2019

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

miss-islington commented Sep 17, 2019 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

This includes such names as "cls", "self", "typename", "_typename",
"fields" and "_fields".
Passing positional arguments by keyword is deprecated.
(cherry picked from commit 2bf31cc)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka storchaka@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue38191

bpo-38191: Accept arbitrary keyword names in NamedTuple() and TypedDi…
d31883f 
…ct(). (pythonGH-16222)

This includes such names as "cls", "self", "typename", "_typename",
"fields" and "_fields".
Passing positional arguments by keyword is deprecated.
(cherry picked from commit 2bf31cc)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2019
Merged
bedevere-bot added type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error awaiting review labels Sep 17, 2019
Copy link
Contributor Author

@serhiy-storchaka: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

miss-islington merged commit 54ba5f1 into python:3.8 Sep 17, 2019
miss-islington deleted the backport-2bf31cc-3.8 branch September 17, 2019 18:41
Copy link
Contributor Author

@serhiy-storchaka: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor Author

@serhiy-storchaka: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka approved these changes

gvanrossum Awaiting requested review from gvanrossum gvanrossum is a code owner

ilevkivskyi Awaiting requested review from ilevkivskyi ilevkivskyi is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants