[proxy] web.archive.org← back | site home | direct (HTTPS) ↗ | proxy home | ◑ dark◐ light
/ cpython Public

bpo-33541: Remove unused __pad function #4377

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 20, 2018
Merged

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

mariocj89 commented Nov 12, 2017

The function was added with the initial implementation 00efe7e.

Should be safe to remove as it is private and mangled.

https://bugs.python.org/issue33541

Function was added with the initial implementation 00efe7e.

Should be safe to remove as it is private and mangled.
Copy link
Member

encukou commented May 16, 2018

I don't think this needs a NEWS entry, but it does have the potential to break some code. It's been around for some time.
Can you create an issue on bugs.python.org, as a place for discussion?

mariocj89 changed the title Remove unused __pad function bpo-33541: Remove unused __pad function May 16, 2018
Copy link
Contributor Author

mariocj89 commented May 16, 2018

Thanks @encukou, Created the issue for discussion. The function is mangled so I'd be surprised if anything was using it though

Copy link
Member

encukou commented May 16, 2018

I talked to Łukasz, the Python 3.8 release manager, and he said this does need a NEWS entry. I added one. Sorry for the confusion!

encukou removed the skip news label May 16, 2018
Copy link
Member

encukou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I plan to merge this after CI checks finish.

abalkin self-assigned this May 20, 2018
abalkin merged commit 89a25ce into python:master May 20, 2018
mariocj89 deleted the __pad branch September 14, 2019 11:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants