Issue37404
Created on 2019-06-25 19:36 by AkshayTakkar, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| server_client | AkshayTakkar, 2019-06-25 19:36 | Server/Client Code to replicate the issue. Note: You'll have to create the certificate.pem and key.pem files | ||
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 14457 | closed | AkshayTakkar, 2019-06-28 18:01 | |
| PR 16457 | merged | Ido Michael, 2019-09-28 10:29 | |
| PR 17495 | merged | miss-islington, 2019-12-07 11:52 | |
| PR 17496 | merged | asvetlov, 2019-12-07 11:54 | |
| PR 17526 | closed | christian.heimes, 2019-12-09 13:51 | |
| Messages (11) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg346550 - (view) | Author: Akshay Takkar (AkshayTakkar) * | Date: 2019-06-25 19:36 | |
I'm working on a server that uses sock_recv from asyncio. await sock_recv(socket, n) never returns if socket is wrapped in ssl using the wrap_socket function from the ssl module. I think the problem stated in this stackoverflow question could be the reason: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40346619/behavior-of-pythons-select-with-partial-recv-on-ssl-socket |
|||
| msg346552 - (view) | Author: Christian Heimes (christian.heimes) * | Date: 2019-06-25 19:42 | |
You can't use sock_recv() with a wrapped SSL socket. A SSLSocket behaves differently because there is user-level buffering. The connection operates on TLS frames and only hands off data after it has been decrypted and verified. asyncio uses wrap_bio(). |
|||
| msg346597 - (view) | Author: Akshay Takkar (AkshayTakkar) * | Date: 2019-06-26 10:20 | |
Can you please elaborate on how to get around this issue? |
|||
| msg346598 - (view) | Author: Andrew Svetlov (asvetlov) * | Date: 2019-06-26 10:35 | |
Use asyncio transports or streams. sock_recv() is a low-level API with a very limited audience. wrapped ssl socket provides a synchronous interface only. Perhaps we should raise an exception if SSLSocket is passed into asyncio functions. |
|||
| msg346599 - (view) | Author: Akshay Takkar (AkshayTakkar) * | Date: 2019-06-26 10:48 | |
Ah, I see. Yes, raising an exception would probably be very useful. Thanks for the info. |
|||
| msg353444 - (view) | Author: Ido Michael (Ido Michael) * | Date: 2019-09-28 10:34 | |
Fixed this issue since the CLA of the past user wasn't signed. Added a check for the socket type in each of the methods: sock_recv, sock_recv_into, sock_sendall, sock_connect, sock_accept. PR: GH-16457 |
|||
| msg357971 - (view) | Author: miss-islington (miss-islington) | Date: 2019-12-07 11:52 | |
New changeset 892f9e0777f262d366d4747a54c33a1c15a49da6 by Miss Islington (bot) (idomic) in branch 'master': bpo-37404: Raising value error if an SSLSocket is passed to asyncio functions (GH-16457) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/892f9e0777f262d366d4747a54c33a1c15a49da6 |
|||
| msg357972 - (view) | Author: Andrew Svetlov (asvetlov) * | Date: 2019-12-07 12:44 | |
New changeset 930cef2770b641f49e69b67840daaa53b65cd0e0 by Andrew Svetlov in branch '3.8': [3.8] bpo-37404: Raising value error if an SSLSocket is passed to asyncio functions (GH-16457) (#17496) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/930cef2770b641f49e69b67840daaa53b65cd0e0 |
|||
| msg357973 - (view) | Author: miss-islington (miss-islington) | Date: 2019-12-07 12:45 | |
New changeset a85066df9423d381e6b233469b00db55563a9f80 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.7': bpo-37404: Raising value error if an SSLSocket is passed to asyncio functions (GH-16457) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/a85066df9423d381e6b233469b00db55563a9f80 |
|||
| msg358086 - (view) | Author: Christian Heimes (christian.heimes) * | Date: 2019-12-09 13:52 | |
The patch broke Python builds without ssl support and caused a minor performance regression in hot paths. I changed the code to only perform the check in debug mode. |
|||
| msg361236 - (view) | Author: Ido Michael (Ido Michael) * | Date: 2020-02-02 14:21 | |
Sorry it broke the version, what could I have done to avoid this? Also can we close this issue? |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:17 | admin | set | github: 81585 |
| 2020-02-03 10:16:45 | asvetlov | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2020-02-02 14:21:34 | Ido Michael | set | messages: + msg361236 |
| 2019-12-09 13:52:06 | christian.heimes | set | status: closed -> open resolution: fixed -> (no value) messages: + msg358086 stage: resolved -> patch review |
| 2019-12-09 13:51:04 | christian.heimes | set | pull_requests: + pull_request17004 |
| 2019-12-07 12:45:27 | asvetlov | set | status: open -> closed stage: patch review -> resolved resolution: fixed versions: + Python 3.8, Python 3.9 |
| 2019-12-07 12:45:10 | miss-islington | set | messages: + msg357973 |
| 2019-12-07 12:44:24 | asvetlov | set | messages: + msg357972 |
| 2019-12-07 11:54:04 | asvetlov | set | pull_requests: + pull_request16974 |
| 2019-12-07 11:52:50 | miss-islington | set | pull_requests: + pull_request16973 |
| 2019-12-07 11:52:39 | miss-islington | set | nosy:
+ miss-islington messages: + msg357971 |
| 2019-09-28 10:34:40 | Ido Michael | set | nosy:
+ Ido Michael messages: + msg353444 |
| 2019-09-28 10:29:53 | Ido Michael | set | pull_requests: + pull_request16037 |
| 2019-09-13 12:26:00 | asvetlov | set | keywords: + easy, newcomer friendly |
| 2019-06-28 18:01:56 | AkshayTakkar | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: patch review pull_requests: + pull_request14274 |
| 2019-06-26 10:48:50 | AkshayTakkar | set | messages: + msg346599 |
| 2019-06-26 10:35:47 | asvetlov | set | messages: + msg346598 |
| 2019-06-26 10:20:58 | AkshayTakkar | set | messages: + msg346597 |
| 2019-06-25 19:42:40 | christian.heimes | set | messages: + msg346552 |
| 2019-06-25 19:36:21 | AkshayTakkar | create | |